@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 4 months agoAcademic languagemander.xyzimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up11.11Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageAcademic languagemander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareFuglyDucklinkfedilinkEnglish29•4 months agofor the record… the engineering behind that was quite sound. it’s their ability to use consistent units of measurements that’s in question.
minus-square@StrykkerlinkEnglish5•4 months agoWell that was when they performed lithobraking with a satellite, but they also did lithobraking on purpose for several rover landings
minus-squareFuglyDucklinkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoYes. And the rover landings worked. (Technically it was aerobraking on the observer.)
for the record… the engineering behind that was quite sound.
it’s their ability to use consistent units of measurements that’s in question.
Well that was when they performed lithobraking with a satellite, but they also did lithobraking on purpose for several rover landings
Yes. And the rover landings worked.
(Technically it was aerobraking on the observer.)