So, I love this site. I’ve been here more-or-less since the beginning, across various accounts. I also have accounts on other Lemmy instances.

One common pattern I see is that instances branch out their communities too soon, and overly dilute the conversation. It makes an instance that is ultimately not that active (compared to any of the big sites that don’t need naming, really) appear to be even less lively, due to so many instances with either nothing at all, a few month old posts, or a generic post linking to a projects blog.

Note that I am not criticizing the instance by pointing out the low activity levels - I really do love this place. It’s just a fact at the moment. You can switch viewing posts by new and scroll down a little to see we get around 5 - 6 posts per hour, occasionally a bit more and occasionally a bit less.

I think that having lots of inactive, dead looking communities is off-putting. I know that I certainly don’t feel encouraged to post in them. I worry this might have a similar effect on other users too.

I do understand that c/programming is deemed as something of a catch-all community, and so anyone could post there rather than the niche communities, but I’m not sure that this is totally obvious to everyone.

Personally, I feel we should purge all the tiny communities that have no posts (or just a single blog post, for example) and encourage people to post in c/programming. Then, new communities can be made when a particular topic becomes large enough to warrant divergence, either because it’s clearly a subject of interest to many users or because it ends up dominating c/programming. c/rust is an example of such a community, as is c/programmerhumor.

I am nobody here, and I was not asked for my opinion, but I just wonder if this topic has been thought about much? I really want this place to thrive. Do any other users here have an opinion? What do the instance admins think?

  • @lysdexic
    link
    English
    14 months ago

    No, you’re lying by using a different definition of “dead”.

    Now you’re being silly and acting defensively. I don’t need to do anything for the [email protected] group to be dead or remain dead, as it was expected to be. Anyone can take a look at it and see that if they filter out your personal inorganic traffic, which is already of dubious relevance, nothing remains.

    You can stay up all night arguing otherwise, but it is what it is.

    It’s ok if you feel that it’s your personal mission to generate traffic for a particular channel on a lemmy instance. Just don’t try to pretend it’s something that’s relevant for anyone beyond yourself.

    • if you feel that it’s your personal mission to generate traffic for a particular channel on a lemmy instance

      Oh! One last fact check on your false claims - I don’t even post on 1 instance! P.S. take note of the upvotes.

    • if they filter out your personal

      …it’ll still be 35 users/month, which is still not dead.

      it’s your personal mission to generate traffic

      I’m not generating the other 34 people who used it this month, which includes, as I mentioned before, someone who actually provided me with a solution to a problem I had. Welcome to why Communities are useful. Not sure what purpose you think they’re for?

      It’s ok if you feel that it’s your personal mission

      As opposed to your apparent personal mission of trying to declare groups dead which actually aren’t?

      Bye now Mr. Gaslighter.

      • @lysdexic
        link
        English
        14 months ago

        …it’ll still be 35 users/month

        I’m not sure you are aware how irrelevant this is. This could mean as little as a single user opening the community page daily, or 30 different users accidentally navigating into the community page from the main page just because an article showed up in their feed.

        To frame the absurdity of this argument, I moderate [email protected] , which in the past month registered also 30 users/month, and that community is also dead.