• knapsackinjury
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s quite a good solution. I’ve been looking at real estate lately and a lot of the lower priced homes have in their description something like “great starter home or investment property.” Investors shouldn’t be able to snatch up all the “starter homes”. Let’s let some of us get into the market!

    • SymbolicLink@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, and rental prices have skyrocketed too.

      During the next federal election this will be my “single issue” that will determine who I vote for.

      At this point I can ignore our insane grocery/telecom prices, even though that is still a huge issue. The housing crises has far worse ripple effects down the chain: potential buyers can’t buy so they rent nicer places, potential renters can’t rent the nice places so they are overpaying for the rentals they can afford, and people who can’t afford any of the rental prices are scraping by with roommates or on the streets.

      And these development companies have the nerve to go to court over government investigations over their shady practices.

      Shameless.

      • EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        During the next federal election this will be my “single issue” that will determine who I vote for.

        Why not just vote properly – for someone who will work for you with honour and respect? Then you can actually sit down with the employee you hired and guide them in the right direction. Hiring some hothead employee who thinks they’ve got it all figured out, and lets you believe they’ve got it all figured out, is a recipe for disaster.

        • HLB217@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why not just vote properly – for someone who will work for you with honour and respect?

          A government that seeks to keep a roof over your head over a few extra dollars in their personal bank accounts IS a government that is treating us with honour and respect. The big two don’t have any respect for the common Canadian, aside from milquetoast progressive talking points occasionally, or populist bullshit.

          If making housing affordable for everyone is a single issue vote then so be it. I can respect that more than a multitude of other idiotic reasons to be a single issue voter.

          • EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            A government that seeks to keep a roof over your head over a few extra dollars in their personal bank accounts IS a government that is treating us with honour and respect.

            That may be true, but importantly the hired employee needs to be working for you, not themselves or some other interest. If they already have it figured out how they want to address these problem before they’ve even talked to you, it is unlikely that they are actually there to do the job they are meant to do.

            Of course, it could also be that you are just as lazy and will refuse to speak with your employee after you’ve hired him. In which case your poor leadership is the true recipe for disaster.

      • FlareHeart@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        During the next federal election this will be my “single issue” that will determine who I vote for.

        This should read PROVINCIAL election. Housing policies are the jurisdiction of the provinces. If you think the Premiers are going to tolerate the Feds mucking around in something they perceive as THEIR jurisdiction, there will be a big fight over it. Take this to your Premier, it’s their wheel-house.

        • SymbolicLink@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair point, Dougie needs to fucking go.

          And for the record OF COURSE I care about other issues. Maybe my original comment was too extreme. There is no way I am going to vote for any rage-baiting, fear mongering, regressive asshole. If someone presented an amazing, ground-breaking housing plan but was also a neo-nazi I wouldn’t vote for them LMAO.

          I am just so tired of all the political theatre around housing. It just seems like a no-brainer that should cross party lines. The only people who don’t care are the people who are rich, or who are in the pockets of rich development/property management companies. Even the older generations who own a single home care, they probably have children who they know won’t ever be able to afford a home or pay a fair price to rent something.

          • FlareHeart@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Welcome to the club. It’s important to vote for the better option even if it feels like it makes no difference.

            If everyone who thought it doesn’t matter got out to vote, it WOULD change the outcome. Voter turnouts have been terrible.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        During the next federal election this will be my “single issue” that will determine who I vote for.

        What do you expect is going to happen? Every party is going to make promises to fix the crisis and none of them will deliver. You really think election promises mean anything?

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d believe the NDP to be sincere in their promise to fix it, at least until they prove otherwise, but they won’t be elected so they won’t get the chance

          • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah it’s easy to believe in someone who will never get a chance to show if they deserved your belief or not.

            • tarsn@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean the alternative is voting for someone who time and again has proven they’re not acting with your interests in mind, and I’m talking both red and blue here

              • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah … I know. I vote NDP too but I’m not under any delusions. Singh is very much ingrained in the upper class. You think he’s gotten this far without making any promises to the wealthy? I don’t have much hope, but at least there’s no track record of them fucking Canadians, like there is with the Libs and Cons.

              • EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Certainly. Hiring among union members will never be in your best interest as their employer. Unions work for the employees – forever and always.

                The employers (i.e. you and me) in some ridings have little choice, though. The talent pool is only so large.

        • Froyn@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If its anything like the US, one party will have a plan and the other party’s plan is different but you can’t see it.

    • regeya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Starter home”, I’m not sure how much more disdain I could have for that title. I bought a home in 2003 that would probably be called that now. It was a typical size for when it was built in 1982 but of course homes must be bigger now. My wife has a friend who has a home that’s nearly double the size yet she’s jealous of all the storage space we have. There’s this trend of building homes with huge main spaces and I don’t understand why.

      I understand if people end up having to move for work of course, and if the home they’re in is literally too small for their family, I just don’t understand moving just because a bigger house is available.