• @suy
    link
    403 months ago

    Is it, really? If the whole point of the library is dealing with binary files, how are you even going to have automated tests of the library?

    The scary thing is that there is people still using autotools, or any other hyper-complicated build system in which this is easy to hide because who the hell cares about learning about Makefiles, autoconf, automake, M4 and shell scripting at once to compile a few C files. I think hiding this in any other build system would have been definitely harder. Check this mess:

      dnl Define somedir_c_make.
      [$1]_c_make=`printf '%s\n' "$[$1]_c" | sed -e "$gl_sed_escape_for_make_1" -e "$gl_sed_escape_for_make_2" | tr -d "$gl_tr_cr"`
      dnl Use the substituted somedir variable, when possible, so that the user
      dnl may adjust somedir a posteriori when there are no special characters.
      if test "$[$1]_c_make" = '\"'"${gl_final_[$1]}"'\"'; then
        [$1]_c_make='\"$([$1])\"'
      fi
      if test "x$gl_am_configmake" != "x"; then
        gl_[$1]_config='sed \"r\n\" $gl_am_configmake | eval $gl_path_map | $gl_[$1]_prefix -d 2>/dev/null'
      else
        gl_[$1]_config=''
      fi