Schleswig-Holstein, Germany’s most northern state, is starting its switch from Microsoft Office to LibreOffice, and is planning to move from Windows to Linux on the 30,000 PCs it uses for local government functions.

Concerns over data security are also front and center in the Minister-President’s statement, especially data that may make its way to other countries. Back in 2021, when the transition plans were first being drawn up, the hardware requirements for Windows 11 were also mentioned as a reason to move away from Microsoft.

Saunders noted that “the reasons for switching to Linux and LibreOffice are different today. Back when LiMux started, it was mostly seen as a way to save money. Now the focus is far more on data protection, privacy and security. Consider that the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) recently found that the European Commission’s use of Microsoft 365 breaches data protection law for EU institutions and bodies.”

  • @0x0
    link
    English
    23 months ago

    It’s done before in Munich. It can work.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      Yeah but they switched back to Windows in 2017 for no reason. :( some Bad rumors say it had to do with Microsoft building its headquater in munich 2016. But no one knows if the decision to build it in munich is indeed related to the switch back to. Windows.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        Seriously? With the amount of political corruption in Germany I really don’t think there’s any reason to doubt that at all

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      “Linux could have the desktop now”

      And yet doesn’t.

      Again, why do enterprises prefer to pay tens of millions per year in licensing rather than deploy Linux as a desktop?

      You think these places don’t have hundreds or thousands of IT folks with Linux expertise?

      • @0x0
        link
        English
        13 months ago

        Blame game, simple.

        Proprietary software comes with a price tag (some people think free = bad), a license (which implies some sort of ownership) and a company behind it which you can sue if something hits the fan. Zero responsibility for the licensee.

        FOSS, in the other hand, is no strings attached (for the most part, some sw is dual-licensed and/or there are paid services): if it hits the fan, you clean it up.

        So proprietary-mentality managers either cough up money for an IT department, which they almost never do, or fork off money to a proprietary company and write it off as an expense and externalize everything, including resposibility.