@[email protected] to The [email protected]English • 5 months agoMan Thinks Games Were Better When He Was Blind to Their Blatant Political Themeshard-drive.netexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1451arrow-down114
arrow-up1437arrow-down1external-linkMan Thinks Games Were Better When He Was Blind to Their Blatant Political Themeshard-drive.net@[email protected] to The [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•5 months agoThere are many win conditions in Civ, so it having “killing everyone else is winning” as a political statement would be a very weak argument imho
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•5 months ago“genocide is good and a valid way to win” is pretty fucked up, if you think about it. So is “obliterate their culture”. You could also have a civ game where you lose if things get to the point of genocide, or the world devolves into a monoculture.
There are many win conditions in Civ, so it having “killing everyone else is winning” as a political statement would be a very weak argument imho
“genocide is good and a valid way to win” is pretty fucked up, if you think about it. So is “obliterate their culture”.
You could also have a civ game where you lose if things get to the point of genocide, or the world devolves into a monoculture.