@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agothis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzimagemessage-square248fedilinkarrow-up11.32Karrow-down160
arrow-up11.26Karrow-down1imagethis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square248fedilink
minus-squareFaceDeerlinkfedilink2•3 months agoThe ideal endpoint is to eliminate the concept of “jobs” entirely. Why should people have to work?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months agoOkay. So why are you breaking that guy’s balls, over automating away jobs, which you don’t want to exist?
minus-squareFaceDeerlinkfedilink3•3 months agoBecause currently we do need jobs. Otherwise why is he upset about AI in the first place?
minus-squareFaceDeerlinkfedilink3•3 months agoSure seems to be, he said he’s “stoked” for when AI comes for the “tech bros”’ jobs. But maybe he should speak up to clarify his own view, rather than you and I speculating about it in a side thread that wasn’t actually about him to begin with?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months agoAre you sure you know what stoked means? Because it sure isn’t anger. But maybe he should speak up to clarify his own view Or you could’ve asked, rather than repeatedly posturing. Especially when he asked you to stop doing that. You need to examine your behavior throughout this thread.
minus-squareFaceDeerlinkfedilink0•3 months agoYou were the one who started talking on his behalf all of a sudden.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months ago So you’re happy to see AI take someone else’s job as long as it isn’t taking your job. You’d rather cheer for people to lose their jobs without anyone calling you out on it, sure. I’m not the angry one wishing unemployment on my “enemies” here. Do you listen to yourself?
minus-squareFaceDeerlinkfedilink-1•edit-23 months agoYes. What’s your point here? Repeatedly quoting my comments back at me isn’t adding anything.
The ideal endpoint is to eliminate the concept of “jobs” entirely. Why should people have to work?
Okay. So why are you breaking that guy’s balls, over automating away jobs, which you don’t want to exist?
Because currently we do need jobs. Otherwise why is he upset about AI in the first place?
Is he?
Sure seems to be, he said he’s “stoked” for when AI comes for the “tech bros”’ jobs. But maybe he should speak up to clarify his own view, rather than you and I speculating about it in a side thread that wasn’t actually about him to begin with?
Are you sure you know what stoked means? Because it sure isn’t anger.
Or you could’ve asked, rather than repeatedly posturing. Especially when he asked you to stop doing that.
You need to examine your behavior throughout this thread.
You were the one who started talking on his behalf all of a sudden.
Do you listen to yourself?
Yes. What’s your point here? Repeatedly quoting my comments back at me isn’t adding anything.