@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agothis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzimagemessage-square248fedilinkarrow-up11.32Karrow-down160
arrow-up11.26Karrow-down1imagethis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square248fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•3 months agoThat stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.
minus-square@TjalinkEnglish3•3 months agoI said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•3 months agoWhat if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?
minus-square@TjalinkEnglish1•3 months agoWell, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-23 months agoYou just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoYou know you can run a lot of these models on your home PC right
That stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.
I said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.
What if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?
Well, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.
You just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.
You know you can run a lot of these models on your home PC right