I know the real answer is reddit but I really don’t want to go back now that I’ve already grown used to life without it. I was hoping for Lemmy to be a viable substitute but it isn’t. I can see how this place is wonderful for the certain type of person but that person is not me. My experience during the past 6+ months has been a net negative and I’m pretty much ready to move on. I just don’t know where else to go.

  • msage
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Can you expand more on those idiotic positions?

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      “America does bad things, so I should support china/russia instead!”

      “Stalin/mao were (anything besides utterly reprehensible dictators)”

      “Communism could’ve worked if-“

      Honorable mention to thinking this coy “I’m going to act all hyper respectful and yet also like I know more than anyone about anything” bullshit gets you anywhere.

      • msage
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Though to be honest, tankies spouting #1 and #2 get heavily downvoted. I don’t even see them anymore, guess my instance defederated them, but they were never strong positions here.

        Perhaps it’s the defederation, but my experience here does not resemble yours.

        • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          They’re mask off on hexbear/lemmygrad, they try to be subversive on lemmy.ml. I have in fact instance blocked the first two, you can usually dodge them on .ml. Lemmy is far less enjoyable if you have not blocked them.

      • msage
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        First two sound like tankies, but communism definitely could work :P

        • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Commune-ism sounds like a lovely idea on a small scale, you gotta solve a lot of political problems to make it work on anything bigger. Social democracies like the scandinavians seem to be the best way we currently know to run a humanitarian society.

          • msage
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Are they though? I just feel like we aren’t solving the issues we ought to.

            First, nobody gets hungry ever again.

            Then, everybody gets roof over their head.

            After that, we can start discussing the next steps.

            And yes, we need to do this globally, with nobody left behind.

            • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              That’s neither exclusive to communism nor has it been achieved in most purportedly communist states (I hear Vietnam’s actually been having a good run of things but I can’t speak to specifics).

              Socialism != communism.

              • msage
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                It’s definitely not happening now under any social democracy.

                Socialism is supposed to be a transformative period, leading to communism. I have no idea why people write the !=.

                • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Because exclusively that’s the communist viewpoint. There are different socialist ideologies than communism. It’s a rectangle vs square situation.

                  • msage
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    But everyone knows that. Nobody even remotely suggested anything close to it.

          • msage
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s like saying we are too stupid to survive.

            • Thorny_Insight@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              That is not an unthinkable scenario. The universe is so vast yet there is no sign of life anywhere else. Why? Perhaps intelligent life simply isn’t intelligent enough and they always end up destroying themselves. A so called “great filter”. Is it behind us or ahead? Who knows.

              • msage
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                Given the state of our climate, I would say it’s very closely ahead of us, and we are not going to make it. Which is a shame, we are so close.

                  • msage
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Right now I don’t see how our current society can survive. We are doing nothing at all to stop burning fossil fuels (renewables go up, but so does fossil burning), the richest find more and more absurd ways to waste energy (bitcoin, LLMs), everywhere more and more people go poor even in developed nations (prices skyrocketing, mainly food and rent), and we are just starting to see that climate is starting to change, and not to our optimistic scenarios.

                    I don’t think we are going to make it.

            • avonarret1
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              How about “There will always be someone exploiting the system/people”

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          There’s a bunch of very active non-ml users that always turn any political discussion to “both sides are terrible, don’t vote for genocide”.

          Once you start recognizing names (or blocking), it gets less depressing. But it does feel like there are a lot more fascist enablers in the political communities than there really are, just because of how fervent those few users are.

          • irreticent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Once you start recognizing names

            One of my favorite features of the Boost app is they allow you to tag a username with whatever label you want. It really helps to highlight the users that regularly argue in bad faith, troll, etc.