• DivineDev
    link
    fedilink
    392 months ago

    Realistically, the “hush” should be “you’re disowned”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      382 months ago

      You’d be fuckin surprised actually, some of these people will support their own family while condemning others for doing the same thing. Dick Cheney has a daughter who he is supposedly very close to who is publicly lesbian, married to a woman and he himself supported their marriage and attended. He then turns around and supports banning gay marriage. I may be under informed on this situation but it’s baffling to me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        252 months ago

        It becomes less baffling when you realize they are of the mindset that the ones making the laws are inherently different and the laws don’t apply. That they’re making those laws “for their own good”(meaning the people not lawmakers).

        It’s confusing, and essentially cognitive dissonance, but it’s definitely there.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          162 months ago

          “Conservatism consists of one policy, to wit: There are those that the law protects but does not bind, and those that the law binds but does not protect.”

      • DivineDev
        link
        fedilink
        122 months ago

        No no, I find this completely believable. It’s like lacking a consistent moral system is a requirement for being conservative.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          It does rather depend on whether politicians are there to enact whatever they want, or to enact the will of the people, and what they should do where those two don’t align. You probably wouldn’t consider it immoral for someone who doesn’t drive to vote one way or another on a roadbuilding project, or for someone without kids to vote on a school project.

          So I don’t see why it should be a problem for a politician who privately supports a particular topic but represents people who don’t, to vote against it; it means they’re doing what they were elected to do and not acting solely in their own interests.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            That’s all well and good but this is talking about gay marriage which is a topic with completely different context and importance than building roads or schools

      • Jojo, Lady of the West
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        The worst part is that they really do feel this way. They really do feel that our very presence hurts them somehow. So despite all the excitement saying otherwise, they project that feeling of offended-ness onto everyone else and say they just want to protect people.