• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Not really (at least at my company). You pay for the campaign (display this content in this location for these dates) and you track your outcomes (number who viewed the ad, number who clicked, number who shopped, number who purchased). If the number who shopped and purchased and is low you might not be interested in continuing that partnership.

    I always recommend based on shop and buy (heavier focus on buy) outcomes so I wouldn’t know bots but they’d need to be able to make purchases.

    • Boz (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      …so the endgame here is bots that can make purchases, but immediately return what they bought for refunds?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Lol I guess maybe! My industry isn’t set up that way (I don’t work in retail e-commerce) but that’s obviously the bigger ad targets on social. Retail can definitely track return metrics though.

        I think it would be hard to get bots past most sophisticated purchase data tracking, but it depends on what you target for that tracking. Like I know a lot of TikTok marketing is built around understanding you aren’t going to get a lot of click throughs on the ad but it is about building brand awareness. If you are just looking at impressions it is a lot easier for bots to sneak in.

        • Boz (he/him)
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I would definitely expect purchase tracking to be stricter than ad view metrics, yeah. And I know a lot of companies that used to have customer-friendly return policies have rolled back most or all of those policies (with or without non-enhshittification reasons). So I was at least partly joking, though I am getting less and less surprised about what bots are able to do. AI technology advancement just keeps accelerating.

          Good point about brand awareness. In all seriousness, I think there’s psychological research suggesting that brand awareness is valuable in and of itself, though I think there’s a limit to how negative the publicity can be and still be valuable to brands. Otherwise, I don’t think there wouldn’t be the concept of “brand safety” for ad placement.

          I feel like bots are basically the optimal tool for cheating automated systems, since it seems reasonable to fight automation with more automation, like the cat-and-mouse development race for captcha. I don’t have the technical expertise to back that up, though, just a general feeling that Murphy’s law applies to all engineering.