@[email protected] to No Stupid [email protected]English • 5 months agoWhy do cameras call it "Macro Lens" if it zooms in and is used to capture tiny objects? Shouldn't it be "Micro Lens"?message-square13fedilinkarrow-up172arrow-down15
arrow-up167arrow-down1message-squareWhy do cameras call it "Macro Lens" if it zooms in and is used to capture tiny objects? Shouldn't it be "Micro Lens"?@[email protected] to No Stupid [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-25 months agoDepends, I think. In the same order of magnitude definitely. Edit: this makes me wonder, is it possible to get an orthographic perspective with an ordinary size (but maybe not standard) lens on a normal camera?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•5 months agoNo, tilt-shift doesn’t have any bearing on whether it’s focal-length is high-enough to make the magnification 1:1… hth! _ /\ _
Depends, I think. In the same order of magnitude definitely.
Edit: this makes me wonder, is it possible to get an orthographic perspective with an ordinary size (but maybe not standard) lens on a normal camera?
I suppose tilt shift lenses can achieve that.
No, tilt-shift doesn’t have any bearing on whether it’s focal-length is high-enough to make the magnification 1:1…
hth!
_ /\ _