• dudinax
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    8 months ago

    One of the justices should have asked “If we decide in favor of immunity, couldn’t Biden claim in order to protect the rule of law he could kill us and replace us with justices who would actually uphold the law and the Constitution?”

    • Paragone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      51
      ·
      8 months ago

      You have to consider what people actually will do.

      They can make this decision knowing that the Dems won’t commit the domestic-genocide they’re committed to enabling,

      knowing that it is the nonwhites & left who’re going to be getting the genociding.

      Political-motivation works that kind of way.

      That is why I want a “political-motivation-ectomy” for civilization.

      Political-motivation is cancerous.

      Issue-diagrams are objective, & capable of cracking even urban-planning problems.

      but who is going to force objectivity/practicality against ideology’s-highjacking?

      The dems won’t, the left won’t, the libertarians can’t even understand civil-infrastructure, the “conservatives” ( privilege-conservatives aren’t the only category of people who “conserve”, as conservationists conserve, but are called non-conservatives… damned newspeak bullshit )

      Those judges know what they’re doing.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        If they don’t, they’re literally signing their own death warrants next time a republican takes office.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          History has repeatedly and firmly demonstrated that rich liberals never believe it will happen to them as it happens to them.

          The megarich ones are right though. But they’re also not actually invested in things like “democracy” and “human rights.”