Study confirms Altria, Philip Morris International, Danone, Nestlé, PepsiCo and Coca-Cola are worst offenders

Fewer than 60 multinationals are responsible for more than half of the world’s plastic pollution, with six responsible for a quarter of that, based on the findings of a piece of research published on Wednesday.

The researchers concluded that for every percentage increase in plastic produced, there was an equivalent increase in plastic pollution in the environment.

“Production really is pollution,” says one of the study’s authors, Lisa Erdle, director of science at the non-profit The 5 Gyres Institute.

An international team of volunteers collected and surveyed more than 1,870,000 items of plastic waste across 84 countries over five years: the bulk of the rubbish collected was single-use packaging for food, beverage, and tobacco products.

  • @[email protected]M
    link
    fedilink
    552 months ago

    The top five brands globally were The Coca-Cola Company (11%), PepsiCo (5%), Nestlé (3%), Danone (3%), and Altria (2%), accounting for 24% of the total branded count

    I would’ve expected a slightly different order, but those companies also control about 24% of the food we buy, so… not surprising.

      • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I would have thought Nestle to be higher. They are massive pieces of shit that poison children, after all. I figured they’d be putting plastic in the ocean on purpose like a Captain Planet antagonist.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          122 months ago

          PepsiCo owns Lays, which makes dry food. Coca-Cola mostly stays with beverages these days.

          • @[email protected]M
            link
            fedilink
            62 months ago

            Sure, but some of that food is in plastic containers. Pepsi owns a shit ton of brands. By revenue, they are twice as big as Coke

            • lad
              link
              32 months ago

              Then it makes them four times more ecological in a way, if that’s even applicable to a company producing that much pollution

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 months ago

          Maccies has had paper cups, fry holders and wrappers for at least two decades, and now everything used within the, er, “restaurant” is reusable

          Is it different where you are?

          • lad
            link
            12 months ago

            They still use plastic straws in some places, and paper cups contain plastic, but yeah they don’t seem to produce so much of (plastic) waste

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -5
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They mostly don’t make their own plastic containers. You have to make a shitton of plastic bottles and caps to make money and there are companies that only make empty plastic bottles and companies that only make plastic caps. Look at the bottom of your plastic bottles and caps for Logos of the companies that produced them.

      • @[email protected]M
        link
        fedilink
        52 months ago

        Did you read the article? It’s not about who made the plastic containers at all, it’s about which company made the product that they contain.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          02 months ago

          When they hire a private company to make their packaging, then there are no public records on how much plastic they actually buy. (It’s in the millions of tons per year range) It also doesn’t account for the amount of energy used to produce packaging (it’s a a fuckton)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 months ago

        I didn’t know why I’m being downvoted, I worked at a plastic bottle factory making millions of bottles per day for many different big companies, including some listed there. They make the bottles and ship them empty to the companies to be filled.