• Lmaydev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    No they explained what they think his reasoning is.

    They think he’s doing it to use Christianity as a defense against his rape accusations. Regardless of what the video says.

    Also fallacy fallacy there from you.

    • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      6 months ago

      The reason it’s a clear fallacy for both of you now is, you said it yourself:

      accusations

      what’s that have to do with his reasoning of why he converted to Christianity?

      Even if it turns out he’s rapist ( which it didn’t yet, because the accuser doesn’t exist yet, believe it or not ), it doesn’t automatically make anything he says untrue…!!

      just watch the video