@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoThe 11-mile long, 600 lbs IMAX print of ‘OPPENHEIMER’i.imgur.comimagemessage-square337fedilinkarrow-up11.88Karrow-down135
arrow-up11.84Karrow-down1imageThe 11-mile long, 600 lbs IMAX print of ‘OPPENHEIMER’i.imgur.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square337fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink20•edit-21 year agoThere are productions that still use film? EDIT: Missed the iMAX part.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•1 year agoMany. And this isn’t even the footage, this is the print for the cinema.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•edit-21 year agoA surprising number of films are still shot on film and then transfered to a digital intermediate for editing and later distribution. Not only the few film imax ones. I wonder if anyone is still doing their editing on film, I highly doubt it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•1 year agoEditing is done on the computer, then the editing software outputs a list of foot and frames numbers that are hand ,machine,cut together.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoI never thought of that as a possibility. Best of both worlds then I guess.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoOr worst. I don’t know enough about editing to say.
There are productions that still use film?
EDIT: Missed the iMAX part.
Many. And this isn’t even the footage, this is the print for the cinema.
A surprising number of films are still shot on film and then transfered to a digital intermediate for editing and later distribution. Not only the few film imax ones. I wonder if anyone is still doing their editing on film, I highly doubt it.
Editing is done on the computer, then the editing software outputs a list of foot and frames numbers that are hand ,machine,cut together.
I never thought of that as a possibility. Best of both worlds then I guess.
Or worst. I don’t know enough about editing to say.