@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agoZero to heromander.xyzimagemessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up1869arrow-down116
arrow-up1853arrow-down1imageZero to heromander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square131fedilink
minus-squareKogasalinkEnglish4•2 months agoThere can’t really be an argument either way. It’s just a matter of convention. “Natural” is just a name, it’s not meant to imply that 1 is somehow more fundamental than -1, so arguing that 0 is “natural” is beside the point
There can’t really be an argument either way. It’s just a matter of convention. “Natural” is just a name, it’s not meant to imply that 1 is somehow more fundamental than -1, so arguing that 0 is “natural” is beside the point