FozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 months agoFunny, those guys don't usually agree on that muchlemm.eeimagemessage-square358fedilinkarrow-up1521arrow-down192file-text
arrow-up1429arrow-down1imageFunny, those guys don't usually agree on that muchlemm.eeFozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 months agomessage-square358fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredudinaxlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down9·6 months agoThe very idea that a liberal can’t be socialist and a socialist can’t be liberal is nonsensical. They are orthogonal concepts. The division between liberals and socialists is plainly promoted in order to divide people.
minus-squareCowbee [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down5·6 months agoLiberalism supports Capitalism, Socialism supports Socialism. They are incompatible.
minus-squaredudinaxlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down4·edit-26 months agoThat’s ridiculous. Liberal socialist societies have been and still are the best to live in.
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·6 months agoSocial democracy is a form of socialism.
minus-squareCowbee [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoSure, if you change the definition of Social Democracy and Socialism. We’ve had this talk too many times to repeat this same song and dance.
The very idea that a liberal can’t be socialist and a socialist can’t be liberal is nonsensical. They are orthogonal concepts.
The division between liberals and socialists is plainly promoted in order to divide people.
Liberalism supports Capitalism, Socialism supports Socialism. They are incompatible.
That’s ridiculous. Liberal socialist societies have been and still are the best to live in.
No such thing.
Social democracy is a form of socialism.
Sure, if you change the definition of Social Democracy and Socialism.
We’ve had this talk too many times to repeat this same song and dance.
Fair enough.
lmao