Can’t you just break down water, use the hydrogen to power the electric motor, and I don’t think O2 as a byproduct is bad, now this is of course an ideal condition, but why hasn’t this been looked into more?

  • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Water is the exhaust product. Once you have water, the potential energy in the original chemical mix has already been released.
    H2 + O --> H2O + energy (in the form of heat or electric potential)

    To break down water you have to reverse the reaction and put that energy back in. That’s how electrolysis works:
    H2O + energy (in the form of electric potential) --> H2 + O

    And since no thermodynamic process is 100% efficient, you will lose some of the energy each time you go back and forth between these reactions.

    • Addv4@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Out of curiosity, would you end up with the same resultant amount of water before and after hydrolysis? I’m aware some energy would be lost, but would hydrolysis actually decrease the amount of water? (sorry if this a dumb question, but I haven’t actually seen it explicitly answered before)

      • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Mass is conserved. If you split water into hydrogen and oxygen, then combine them back into water, you will have the same amount of water as when you started.

        That’s assuming you don’t have leaky equipment in your lab, of course.

        • Addv4@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          OK, thanks for the answer, it been bugging me for a bit and I couldn’t definitively answer it. I’ve heard the argument that something hydrolysis would result in fresh water being decreased, good to know my first feeling (that that argument was bs) is true.