Many so called “deep fakes” are in fact just pardies, pieces of art and so on putting withour the context or reclaimed with another backstroy.
The initial case to creat a picture may be legit, while a internet troll or even a actuall agent with an political agency use the pic out of context.
Lets provide an example. Lets say I would make a caricature of a politican for a meme. After that, somebody else comming, taking the caricature and make something different out of it. Fake News for instance.
Where comes the problem with “deep fakes” in?
As far as I see, Fair Use protects the first step. Its allowed to make caricatures from politicans. The second step doesn’t actually make a deep fake, just use a picture that was there before.
Many so called “deep fakes” are in fact just pardies, pieces of art and so on putting withour the context or reclaimed with another backstroy.
The initial case to creat a picture may be legit, while a internet troll or even a actuall agent with an political agency use the pic out of context.
Lets provide an example. Lets say I would make a caricature of a politican for a meme. After that, somebody else comming, taking the caricature and make something different out of it. Fake News for instance. Where comes the problem with “deep fakes” in? As far as I see, Fair Use protects the first step. Its allowed to make caricatures from politicans. The second step doesn’t actually make a deep fake, just use a picture that was there before.