Small farms and Black farmers are going out of business, while corporate-controlled farms are booming, raking in subsidies

Record numbers of American farms are going out of business with small farms and Black farmers the hardest hit – again, according to the 2022 agriculture census, a comprehensive snapshot of the state of America’s farms and farmers published every five years by the Department of Agriculture (USDA). Yet industrial factory farms rearing thousands of livestock in confinement have further expanded into rural America, acquiring smaller farms, raking in taxpayer subsidies and generating environmental harms.

The agriculture census is a mammoth data collection effort involving more than a million farmers, which tracks the number, size and types of farm across sectors, as well as the farmers and the financials – at the national, state and county levels. It provides insights into the impact – good and bad – of government programs on farmers, workers, land use, animals, waterways and the climate, and should inform future policy. The latest data set includes the Covid pandemic – an extraordinary time when global food prices, government farm subsidies and food insecurity all surged.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    America is a factory. A money factory. Workers are exploited in virtually every industry to churn out as much product as possible as quickly as possible so that the bosses can increase profit margins and talk about productivity to the shareholders.

    • Nudding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I thought the internet would help us overthrow our corporate masters but instead it’s just shit posting and racist social media.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Are you sure this isn’t just a way of distracting yourself from an atrocity against animals that you are participating in that you do not have to? Your choices are not inevitable.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes, I’m sure that American late-stage capitalism is not a way of distracting myself from animals being slaughtered for food.

        What a silly question.

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          But you understand that American late-stage capitalism does not prevent you from conducting yourself in a way that is not cruel and violent towards farmed animals, right? It really seems like you are trying to make yourself think about a different subject so that you can avoid thoughts and emotions that you are unwilling to process. You would hardly be unique in that respect, you can witness people doing it every day.

          To be clear, there is a moral imperative not to treat sentient creatures as property.

  • jerkface@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    The animals we create are morally equivalent to our own children and are owed the same unconditional love and protection. The experiences of animals are real and matter. Their suffering is identical in nature to your own. It harms us when we take pleasure in cruelty and violence.

  • pan_troglodytes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    factory farming is far more economically viable - real, in person/family farming is really hard work. most people cant do it unless they’re born into a farming family & many choose not to continue. tractors, combines, etc are not cheap, and a bad year might ruin you financially. it’s far simpler and easier for everyone (in the supply chain) to get a corporation to do the farming.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The choice isn’t between multinational argocorp factory farms and suburban/urban neighborhoods each creating their own co-op and raising animals for food.

      But setting that aside, your view of what’s economically viable completely skips over the significant negative health impacts on society that American factory farming practices produce, and how those costs are borne in other areas of the economy.

      And this is all just health and economic concerns, we haven’t even touched the morality of the horrific conditions the animals are raised in, but frankly that just makes me really depressed so I’ll leave that alone.

      • pan_troglodytes
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        not sure what you’re referring to in terms of health impacts to society regarding corporate farming - food is significantly more readily accessible and cheaper (and partially unhealthier) than at any point in history. a lot of the responsibility for that comes down to factory farming.

        morality wise? free roaming/uncaged/whatever animals are still going to be killed in great numbers so that we can eat. people have been killing and eating other animals since before humanity evolved from Homo Erectus. the “quality of life” question is rather meaningless, animals that exist in the food supply chain were literally born so they could be turned into food. it’s criminally inefficient and not economically viable to raise 10 cows (or pigs or whatever) in the same space where you can raise 40. vertical integration will be the next big milestone, and it’ll be a big win for everyone involved.

        • DarthFrodo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          the “quality of life” question is rather meaningless, animals that exist in the food supply chain were literally born so they could be turned into food.

          And if someone bred humans to be slaves, these would be meant to be slaves, so it would actually be moral to keep them as slaves.

          Solid logic. Abolishion was a mistake, guys!

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’ve convinced me.

          Chattel slavery is moral, as long as we start with clones.

          If they never know freedom, and they’re private property bred for the sole purpose of being slaves, it’s moral.

          Do you want to start the change.org petition, or should I?

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Factory farming” refers specifically to industrial scale animal agriculture. Animal agriculture does not produce calories, it consumes them. It is a way of refining safe, cheap, sustainable plant products into harmful, expensive, addictive luxury products. Factory farming is not necessary to feed the country, it is a way of exploiting humans and non-human animals more effectively to grow capital.

      • pan_troglodytes
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        then what terminology is used to refer to industrial scale agriculture in general? I’ve always used “factory farming” for corpo owned farms.

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Yeah, well, your opinion clearly isn’t informed by much. But you’re awfully fucking confident about it, even think it is “cold hard truth”. Lurk moar.