US concerned NASA will be overtaken by China’s space program::undefined

  • veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    ·
    9 months ago

    If they were truly concerned, they’d start giving it the funding it deserves.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      128
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They’ve tried everything except actually funding NASA, and they’re all outta ideas.

      NOTE: China WILL overtake NASA, the same way they are dominating the renewable energy sector — because they invest heavily in science, and they do it early. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand this shit.

        • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          9 months ago

          Unfortunately that company is the best hope we have to stay ahead. With their low cost they can monopolize the worldwide launch market(except Russia and China). So that funding, strategically, must continue.

          What should also happen is funding spacex competitors, so we stay on the bleeding edge.

    • demesisx@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 months ago

      I came here to say exactly this.

      Perhaps a space race with China would rekindle the motivation for our money grubbing demagogues to actually fund it.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, it won’t. They’ll just relocate to China, or maybe a super yacht out in international waters. They’ll continue milking every last cent out of the US until it’s a dead dried up husk of a nation and then they’ll just move to the next one. Their supporters are too stupid to realize where the end of the path they’ve been told to walk is going to take them, and they’d rather blame anyone else but themselves for all the problems they face. So no, a space race with China won’t fix shit.

        • demesisx
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Judging by the state of the US, you’re much more likely to be right than I am, you cynical bastard!

          😂

  • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Gee whiz, maybe we should have been properly funding our space program all of these years instead of wasting it on making the military industrial complex filthy fucking rich and the world less secure overall?

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      9 months ago

      Especially stupid considering last time they gave the space program appropriate funding, it led to a lot of advancements that the military industrial complex could use.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        You make it sound like the military advancements were an unexpected byproduct, as opposed to the real goal.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          9 months ago

          The goal was optics. Kennedy didn’t know what advances would result from Apollo. He wanted to show that the US was better at science and technology than Russia.

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            The science of putting a ballistic payload anywhere, including heaven.

            The space race was awesome because it let the two countries measure their dicks (specifically their military dicks) without actually obliterating the planet.

            The “for all mankind” angle was a great way to frame things for the population of Earth, for sure. But just like mobile chemical WMD labs in Iraq, sometimes the given justification and actual justification are two different things.

            Don’t get me wrong, there absolutely were beneficial optics. Something doesn’t have to just be for one thing. But it was always primarily about practical demonstration of weapons capacity under the facade of human exploration.

            • RedFox@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I don’t disagree, but has anyone found corroborating evidence or documentation, past speculation and reasonable assumption?

              • RedFox@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Ha, I was actually taking about the space program, but same for the invasion. Although, I feel like more people have come forward about the invasion being BS than early space program stuff.

              • Windex007@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                No, I don’t think anyone has definitely proven that George W Bush and Colin Powell KNEW that the WMD claims in Iraq were bullshit when they were presenting them as the primary justification for the war.

                It’s just the nature of the beast.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      People behind the scenes are siphoning NASA space research money and turning it into space profit instead. The growth of private space companies starting in the US is no coincidence. Blame oligarchs for steering the country into a dead end.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Hate on spacex and its competitors as much as you want, im not saying you dont have cause.

        But defunding NASA caused this. Those billionaires looked and said holy shit, the entire nasa budget is only that much? And they arent building rockets anymore? I can literally fund my own space program? Ide be crazy not to

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      To be fair, it’s not as if those things are mutually-exclusive. For example, you know how the Hubble Space Telescope is this extremely unique and nigh-irreplaceable scientific instrument that cost a pretty big fraction of NASA’s entire budget?

      Well, it turns out we actually have dozens of the damn things; it’s just that we couldn’t be bothered to actually point more than one of them away from Earth instead of towards it.

      Hell, a decade ago the National Reconnaissance Office gave NASA a couple for free 'cause they just had 'em lying around, but (as far as I know) NASA hasn’t managed to scrounge up enough money from the couch cushions to spruce 'em up and launch 'em yet.

      • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        They certainly don’t have to be, but there is a well established pattern of the US government getting waaay too chummy with corporations to the point that it can undermine what’s best for the people in pursuit of corporate interests.

  • TheFriar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    US: continually decides to not fund scientific exploration of space

    Also US: GUYS! BE AFRAID! ANOTHER COUNTRY DID DECIDE TO SPEND MONEY ON IT! NOW WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO IF…UM…WELL, I GUESS IF THEY TAKE OVER SPACE…? Or…wait, what are we concerned about? Ah, fuck it. Cut NASA’s budget again. We got genocide to fund and taxes to cut for the wealthy.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Same with Republicans and the border.

      “Do something about the border!”

      “Ok, we need funds. Please give them to us.”

      “No! Do something about the border!”

      “We can’t because you won’t give us the money.”

      “Too bad! Do something about the border!”

      • Nudding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Didn’t Biden agree with those idiots that the border is the most important issue of the day?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Probably. I don’t remember. I do remember them screaming that something has to be done about the border, then the Democrats gave them virtually everything they asked for on the border and Biden said he would sign the bill, but then Trump told them not to agree to it because it would hurt his campaign and they shot down the bill that would have given them what they wanted.

          And the really sad part is that half the country, at least half the country, doesn’t even know.

          • Nudding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yep, you have a ghost president calling the shots for half the elected representatives, and the current president condoning a genocide. Really no winning.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Remember when you just told me that I support genocide by existing because I haven’t rioted?

              Maybe you aren’t the best person to be talking about this. Because apparently you think around 8 billion people support genocide.

              • Nudding@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                9 months ago

                I’m sorry that you’re having so much trouble with this thought process. Good luck with the genocide.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I’m not having any trouble at all. You believe my lack of death means I support genocide, unless I do the things you’ve said. And since you claim I already support genocide, you must know for a fact that I didn’t do those things you said.

                  Therefore, I support genocide by existing.

                  Are you going to pretend you didn’t write what I pasted above?

                  Honestly, I’m just waiting for you to tell me to kill myself. That’s the next step.

                • orrk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  my god, like, could you stop using the genocide logic to do this shit? you see “the people in Gaza deserve to be targets of a genocide because they didn’t rise up against Hamas”

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes. And now we’re going to have two senile coots yelling “He let the illegals in!” back and forth at one another as we stumble into another national embarrassment of an election season.

    • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      They are likely going to fund it less and give more and more of its mission over to space force and private companies is my guess

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        That would also work.

        The only thing that won’t work for space is the thing we’re doing now:

        • Maintaining a vice-like government control
        • Using that government authority to choose not to move forward

        Progress only stops under a narrow set of conditions that need to be actively implemented by the government. Progress is actually natural, and progress stopping requires enormous centralized effort to interfere with people getting things done.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Theoretically private programs would be an increased cost over a NASA only program since private companies want a profit margin.

            But Congress being what it is tends to require NASA programs to create jobs in a lot of different voting districts across the country which leads to an insane amount of inefficiencies.

            We can’t have nice things because of pork barrel politics.

            • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Private Companies however have no insintive to actualy innovate, if you look at them they are all taking decades old NASA and USSR Space program tech and resuing it … and callling it innovation

              • cole@lemdro.id
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I’m sorry… this is not true lol. You know what SpaceX is up to, right? At the least, but there are tons of interesting and innovative companies. I mean hell look at Stoke Space

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      If we fold it into the space force and say it’s for targeting woke weirdos…we’ll get a billion dollars through congress by tomorrow

        • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Intelligence that doesn’t come from jeebus?! They’ll burn that ark before it leaves the ground

          Search for god or his patio or whatever…now you’ve got Midwest money

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            “Search for extraterrestrial divine intelligence” or “a strategy to get closer to God through space colonization”, say, a Stanford torus in some L point (that’s so expensive that it ain’t gonna happen, but they’ll also be very excited, I think).

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        We could just say the “anti-woke” part and not even bother with the space force part and that would probably work.

        The woke boogieman is the biggest thing to scare them in years.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          The woke boogeyman scares us because it, itself, is a set of false threats that are distracting us from real threats.

          Like, we’re worried about war, a shifting global power structure, the degradation of systems of detente that keep the worst in humanity from emerging, and the woke crowd wants us to treat the feelings of exclusion of trans people as the most important threat on the board.

          The woke movement is a boogeyman movement, and that’s why we treat it as dangerous. The woke movement is a push to get new boogeymen added to our threat list and moved to top priority over things we know will actually kill us.

          And thing that really, really scares us, is that the system that has proven to be the salve for the ills of massive unleashed violence, the system we call free market economics, is being targeted by the woke crowd because they refuse to read the history of the things they’re proposing. They’re all like “we don’t want people to suffer so let’s abolish private property”. That’s like saying “we don’t want people to drown, and people tend to drown when they’re near boats, so let’s destroy this boat we’re all in, to prevent drowning!”

          It’s terrifying to us because there are serious things to be afraid of, and the woke movement is asking us to ignore or even embrace those things.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            There is no “woke movement.” That’s exactly why you’re scared of a boogieman. They don’t exist either.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    9 months ago

    One can only hope.

    The last time that happened, we explored the moon and developed the space shuttle program. We got microchips and memory foam.

    Ideological rivals encourage congress throwing money into big science. Apollo returned $14 on the dollar. It’s a good investment.

  • lemmus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    Choosing Musk and SpaceX for Artemis is likely NASAs biggest mistake.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      It was always part of Musk’s plan to cripple NASA funding and pump that money into SpaceX.

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you look at the Artemis mission and think starship is the weakest part of the plan, you are simply not being objective.

    • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      At least for ISS, the choice is either Musk or Putin.

      I don’t know which one is worse, especially considering Musk is aiding Putin via Starlink in Ukraine.

      Ukraine claims Russian forces using Musk’s Starlink in occupied areas

      But as someone who works in the industry, it is a bleak outlook. NASA absolutely needs more funding for its human spaceflight exploration, Earth Science, robotic exploration, and astronomy/astrophysics.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      SpaceX has launched more successful missions this year than every other space agency put together.

      Fuck Musk and all that, but if you’re posting this bullshit, you have Musk derangement syndrome.

    • gaifux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      9 months ago

      NASA is a fraud. Musk is just the latest goofy face of govt black projects. Keyfabe

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Have they considered renaming it X and firing all their expert staff to make NASA more profitable?

  • aew360@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is a good thing. Competition with the USSR made NASA what it is.

  • Gazumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    Who would have imagined that decades of funding cuts and pressure to rely upon Musk would allow another nation to take the lead? (Sarcasm)

  • Rin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Dang maybe we should take a fraction of the trillions we spend on the military to fund scientific research, and also health and education while we’re at it so we’d get even more potential scientists.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m sure throwing more money and contracts at Musk and SpaceX is going to help solve the problem any day now. /s

  • TakiMinase@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Export all your technology and jobs to cheaper labour to make more profit. Now you will slowly become bankrupt, as no one can afford the enshitification products and services.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    So they had no issue relying on Russia to service the ISS ever since they shutdown the space shuttle, but now they’re afraid of China… doing space science faster?

    Ignoring the fact that this is not even a real concern, maybe don’t spend morbillions on free munitions for Israel or Lockheed’s next stupid idea.

    They defunded NASA so hard that they started hallucinating about going back to the moon with 15% of the Apollo budget.

    • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      At the time, Russia wasn’t as……problematic. We had been working with Russia as an International Partner since the very early days of ISS and even during Shuttle/Mir.

      Obviously they did become problematic, but we didn’t have other options until SpaceX. Now that’s….obviously got its own issues, but Russia is vastly different than China when it comes to space. Russia needs the money, China already has it.

      • N00dle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        The fact that NASA had to rely on Roscosmos in the first place is shameful. It highlights long standing issues facing the space program. I think some of these problems trace back to the cost of the ISS. It’s been hard to convey the importance and investment into the future the station provides.

        For China their station provides proof of concept that they can achieve similar results one day both to themselves and the world watching.

    • N00dle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The amount of money spent on Apollo was insane. A reduced budget should have been sufficient. It’s just been weighted down by shit cost-plus contracts and the abomination that is SLS.

      The fear of China here is that they are basically single handedly their closest competitor. They’re the only other nation thats managed a Mars Rover landing, building space station, and have their own plans for Moon and Mars with taikonauts( astronaut equivalent) on the ground in the future.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Their station has like three modules (with plans to add 3 more) and capacity for 3 people. The ISS has at least 16 modules (maybe over 30 depending on what you count as a module) and capacity for over a dozen people.

      Like many things from authoritarian countries, it looks nice but isn’t even close in terms of capabilities.

      • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Authoritarianism is not equal to capabilities. In fact, the Soviet space program was significantly more capable for a very long time