I had someone steel this and change “butts” to “Christian” and weirdly enough, lengthen my skirt. Kept the flame boots, but no short skirts.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5111 months ago

    Too many people would change their minds based on what the sign says.

    Does you reaction change if the sign read: “Black Lives Matter” or if it read “Back the Blue”?

    Or one that says “Trans women are women” vs “trans women aren’t women”?

    Or “pineapple on pizza is ok” vs “pinapple on pizza is the work of the devil”?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2011 months ago

      Honestly, the first thing that I thought about was what if the sign had a slur word. Sure freedom of speech means say what you wanna say, that doesn’t mean people aren’t gonna sock you in the face.

      • stebo
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        free speech ≠ hate speech

        Everyone is allowed to have an opinion but if your opinion involves being a dick to certain people, keep it for yourselves.

        In the comic above, no certain group is targeted so there’s no reason to be offended.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            Pretty sure it was made by a left wing gay man whos existence was considered offensive to conservatives

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              711 months ago

              if it was made by a left wing gay man then i guess they are both gay and dumb because they inadvertently made a comic that pushes narratives used to defend homophobia

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -211 months ago

                No offense but based on what I’m hearing you need to study your history of censorship and left wing support of free speech in response to that censorship. And I mean government censorship, not reddit banning a right winger and them crying about it.

          • stebo
            link
            fedilink
            -511 months ago

            Yeah it doesn’t really make sense. “Butts” isn’t offensive to anyone and no you don’t have the right to offend a group of people.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                Small nitpick, but stupid / evil suggests it’s some static state of being, when it’s a choice. Selfish is a good descriptor though, as is ignorant, greedy, bigoted, hateful, fascist…

              • stebo
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                so when are you allowed to be offensive and when are you not?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  You always are, and people are always allowed to call you an asshole if they feel compelled to do so.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The problem with free speech is probs that what people are really fighting over is who gets to control and define what “free” speech is. Only in an anarchist society would free speech really be as you described - say what you want, but be prepared to face the consequences of your words (and actions). Without the protection of government and socio/economic hierarchies, bigots wouldn’t feel quite as invincible while they spew hate and oppression.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      I think I’m still of the mind that “intent to incite violence” is the line. And even that can be crossed when the government needs to be overthrown.

      But I could be convinced otherwise

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        Violence is extremely useful and will be the only tool you have left if you want to stop climate change or protect yourself+your social network from the effects of capitalism.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          I think climate change is beyond the point of violence. The number of people, corporations, and equipment involved in the production and consumption of fossil fuels is beyond what non-military action could take on. Not to mention you have to get people to filter between useful petrochemical products (medical supplies) and problematic ones (god damned plastic bags, mylar balloons, fuckin solo cups) and not just arson us back to the stone-age.

          Things are gonna suck for a long time before they get better.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              Ideally political leaders will get the cocks out of their asses and realize that their children and grand-children WILL suffer through the most unusual chapter in human history. For sure it wont be the what most people go through but there will be a noticeable reduction the the quality of life for everyone.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                111 months ago

                Political leaders, especially in the anglosphere, have no interests beyond self-enrichment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1211 months ago

      The point still stands, in the minutiae you’re addressing. People post absolute garbage opinions on a regular basis, and are free to do so, as long as their platform allows it. This doesn’t go into the consequences of pissing off a lot of people, but you’re still free to do it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        911 months ago

        The point does not stand. I don’t think any set of rules that sees “N***** N***** N*****” as acceptable speech should be respected, nor any person who thinks that way.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          811 months ago

          I agree with the spirit, but I disagree with what the point of the comic is - it’s not trying to make a point about respect per se, just about freedom of speech. Even if you wouldn’t be a part of a community that allows hate speech, if you encounter it “in the street” so to speak - there’s just nothing you can do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1011 months ago

      Let’s replace some of the words in your comment to “I am a pooopoo head and I eat poopoo”, and see how do you feel then. Bet pretty stupid, huh?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -111 months ago

              Defending free speech that says good things is different than defending free speech that is just being racist. The implication of hypocrisy that you’re suggesting with your comment doesn’t really work unless you view all speech as equivalent, which it self evidently isn’t.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                311 months ago

                Defending free speech that says good things is different than defending free speech that is just being racist.

                That’s kinda the point I’m making, though. This argument is not nuanced enough, because the only standard it sets is that for something to be truly offensive, it must “offend everyone”. This is an absurd and impossible standard.

                The implication of hypocrisy that you’re suggesting with your comment doesn’t really work unless you view all speech as equivalent, which it self evidently isn’t.

                I didn’t say anything about hypocrisy. I just said that the argument presented is insufficient.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          Because it’s a short comic, it doesn’t have the time to go into the nuances. One word has a long history of being used to dehumanize an “other” group and the other just a word for a body part. If body parts offend you as much as racial slurs, you may have your own issues.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -2
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Still missing the point

            If this logic can be used to defend race hate, then maybe the logic isn’t sound

            Also, if the issue is too nuanced for you to convey in a short comic, maybe don’t make a short comic about it

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              811 months ago

              If the only argument against something is that it’s offensive and they can’t rationalize it at all, the argument can be thrown out. That’s all the comic is about.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                5
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                That’s just rationalisation. To me, this comic highlights the absurd logic of bigots and free speech absolutists. “Offensive to everyone” is an impossible standard to meet; bigots are obviously never going to be offended by bigotry, so even hate speech doesn’t meet that threshold.

                Also, it’s never just “butts”, and it’s never just a single person, so it’s a bit of a misrepresentation.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  211 months ago

                  Bigots can’t rationalize their bigotry. At least not in a way that can’t be torn apart. They always end up using circular logic, which is what the comic is address.

                  I’m “offended” at racism because it creates an unsafe culture for everyone involved. I can cit research about the effects of generational racism leading to higher crime for instance.

                  They’re offended at the sight of black people being able to use the same water fountain as them. They can’t tell me why, which is why their argument ends at their “offense” and is the scenario the comic is about.

                  Also, it’s never just “butts”

                  I’ve seen people online get offended at the bumper sticker “Fuck Cancer”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            511 months ago

            I’m gonna need you to engage in just a little more abstract thinking for me. I’m not talking about racism either.

            Let’s try another thing instead: “Got hates fags”

            How about: “Jews did 9/11”

            It’s pretty easy to say “free speech! I can say whatever I like!! I’m not responsible for your hurt feelings!” without any nuance, but speech is a bit more complicated than that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              011 months ago

              The cartoon isn’t about free speech absolutism. It’s just about offensive stuff. All the things you said are hate speech.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -111 months ago

                  It’s from a website called TheDevilsPanties bro. I get where you’re coming from but it’s clearly about book bannings/conservatives getting upset with content in movies/books/signs/etc. The comic doesn’t explicitly say it’s excluding hate speech but it shouldn’t have to.

          • darcy
            link
            fedilink
            411 months ago

            where do u draw the line?

            (genuine question , not advocating hate speech)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              011 months ago

              Hate speech is a call to attack some people.

              It may sometimes sound like “just offensive”, since it often uses offensive code words to coordinate an attack.

      • @pythonoob
        link
        011 months ago

        Well you wouldn’t wanna be raped now would you /s