one assessment suggests that ChatGPT, the chatbot created by OpenAI in San Francisco, California, is already consuming the energy of 33,000 homes. It’s estimated that a search driven by generative AI uses four to five times the energy of a conventional web search. Within years, large AI systems are likely to need as much energy as entire nations.

  • FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s the opposite of what he said. That sort of usage isn’t what ChatGPT is good for, it’s best to use it for other kinds of things.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Feel free not to, I guess. But again, that wasn’t the point of my comment. You mistook bleistift2’s statement in the opposite way it was intended. ChatGPT’s not intended as a replacement for a search engine so evaluating it on that basis is misleading.

      • MagicShel
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s just like… your opinion, man.

        AI is going to be an important tool in the future. Decrying it as bad is similar to folks saying investing in green energy was stupid because without economies of scale they were expensive and inefficient.

        Computers are using more energy. Instead of turning them off, let’s find ways to produce energy less destructively, such as nuclear which would benefit EVs and all energy usage.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          AI is going to be an important tool in the future.

          The future for the people who aren’t dying of thirst due to the lack of water?

          • MagicShel
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Did you even read the rest of my post?

              • MagicShel
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Then solar. Wind. Geothermal. Whatever. Energy usage is never, ever going down unless population does and probably not even then. If that silicon isn’t used for AI it’ll be something else. Then what?

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Ah, you’re one of the ‘we shouldn’t do anything about ecological disasters because something else will come along and make things just as bad anyway’ crowd. I hear that’s the latest right-wing school of thought now that it’s almost impossible to deny climate change is happening.

                  • MagicShel
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    What’s your plan, everyone just turn back the wheel of time and homestead and grow potatoes and leave technology behind? Because regressiveness is a lynchpin of right-wing thought, too.

                    I don’t think either of us are served by attacking each other, but we can dance if you want to, we can leave your friends behind, 'cause your friends can’t… Oh sorry I got distracted.