• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    404 months ago

    In reality she would have sacked half of them without even being in the room and had them escorted out by the same security that protects her. Ain’t nobody getting anywhere near her with a guillotine.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      144 months ago

      She would mumble something about needing to streamline the company’s processes to remain competitive. Not to the workers, of course-- To a board of directors who are barely paying attention, other than making sure number goes up.

      The workers would just be informed that half of them are no longer employed there.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      even Ayn Rand didn’t particularly like Ayn Rand,

      not to say she was rational of course.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      54 months ago

      I was into Ayn Rand in high school and in retrospect I guess I’d say that, given the things I thought were important, I was rational. But certainly my values weren’t quite…I dunno…human?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Just one caveat - if you double production, you’re not doubling your income or profit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      174 months ago

      That’s why the realistic outcome to this scenario is that she fires half her workforce there by maintaining the same level of production while also slashing labour costs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      44 months ago

      I mean you might be, depending upon what % of the total market you operate and what the exact inputs of the new method are.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        No, you never will without increasing prices to cover the additional overhead of increased production.

        Remember, only the machine is doubling efficiency, but operations has to increase to handle the new output and resources required.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          But some operational costs (I.e. Ground Rent, Marketing, Legal Fees, IP Costs etc…) do not scale with increased output.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              Again this is a case of “it depends”. If you are not a market driver then yes it does. (‘mom & pop motor vehicles’ isn’t going to make a dent in the global car market. )

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          Not if most of you cost is labor, you’ll be approaching marginal increase in costs but still certainly of double income.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            The labor costs aren’t going away, just shifting. You have to increase employment in other areas to handle a 100% increase in product output.

            Besides the fact that labor costs are rarely a large enough portion of a manufacturer’s budget to make that big of a difference.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    104 months ago

    See, this is why egoism makes way more sense than objectivism as a selfishness-based philosophy.

  • Troy
    link
    fedilink
    34 months ago

    For the longest time I used to shelve Rand next to Marx on my bookshelf. I’ve read both at various points (might as well learn the source material if you’re going to argue about politics…), but it tickled me as a centrist to annoy their ghosts equally.