I was trying to figure out how many generations could theoretically exist at the same time, so I decided to first check Guinness. Hopefully I did all the math correctly.

  • Blamemeta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well assuming everyone had kids at 18, and lived to 122, max is 6 generations.

    If everyone had kids very young, at 13, it maxes out at 9 generations.

    • Chris
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think OP made an error in stating you had to be 18. The oldest living person ever was 122 (as indicated by Blamemeta). As long as you are allowed a few pre-18 births, you can get to 7 generations). At 15 years old you can get to 8 generations.

      • PaulDevonUK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are missing things like this in your calculation.


        Under current Pennsylvania law, teenagers aged 13, 14 and 15 may or may not be able to legally engage in sexual activity with partners who are less than 4 years older. Such partners could not be prosecuted under statutory rape laws, but may be liable for other offenses, even when the sexual activity is consensual.

      • pdqcp@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, OP might be unaware that in the past, it was more common to have a child before the age of 18 than the opposite, specially in rural areas

    • ApollosArrow@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that’s my bad. I forgot about the last one when I posted. I updated the title to reflect the proper range.