Leo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showM to Linux and Tech News@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showEnglish · 1 year agoHDMI Forum to AMD: No, you can’t make an open source HDMI 2.1 driverarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up1109arrow-down10
arrow-up1109arrow-down1external-linkHDMI Forum to AMD: No, you can’t make an open source HDMI 2.1 driverarstechnica.comLeo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showM to Linux and Tech News@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-21 year agoWhy is there a widely used protocol with no public specification available?
minus-squareMrPoopbutt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoMoney. Hollywood execs love their DRM.
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agoAh, right, the illegal HDMI-splitters. 🤪🐦
minus-squarecobra89@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoNot just widely used, but a monopoly. TVs don’t come with any other ports and now they’re restricting who can use this technology that has no other choice. There needs to be an antitrust lawsuit against the HDMI forum IMO.
Why is there a widely used protocol with no public specification available?
Money.
Hollywood execs love their DRM.
Ah, right, the illegal HDMI-splitters. 🤪🐦
Not just widely used, but a monopoly. TVs don’t come with any other ports and now they’re restricting who can use this technology that has no other choice.
There needs to be an antitrust lawsuit against the HDMI forum IMO.