Appimages totally suck, because many developers think they were a real packaging format and support them exclusively.

Their use case is tiny, and in 99% of cases Flatpak is just better.

I could not find a single post or article about all the problems they have, so I wrote this.

This is not about shaming open source contributors. But Appimages are obviously broken, pretty badly maintained, while organizations/companies like Balena, Nextcloud etc. don’t seem to get that.

  • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Appimages are awesome for the regular user. Single file, just double click to run anywhere. Snap and Flatpak should die a quick death and all the work should be used to improve Appimages. There’s no other concept for the end user as simple and clear as this.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I double clicked, the program didn’t run because it’s missing some dependencies

    • Yubishi@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      They mimic the apple application format to some degree and it is a great way to distribute. The real detriment is sandboxing but with more support this could be included.