I love hearing about unique takes on game mechanics. Someone recently convinced me that limited inventories are kind of abused currently and that unlimited inventory systems would give more player choices.

  • lloram239@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I absolutely hate that concept, as even when, or especially if, it matters, it’s in the most cookie-cutter binary in-your-face kind of way, literally “(a) eat baby (b) safe baby”.

    I don’t mind choice in games, but it should be actual choice, i.e. you do things because you want to do them, not because you think they will make the story go to the “good ending” or worse yet, be forced on you to stay on the good path, as the game is only build for good and bad path and everything in the middle is just mechanically broken.

    The best choices in games are fully mechanics driven or just cosmetic, though that’s pretty damn rare in narrative games. In most games choice is generally just bad and annoying, as you aren’t focused on the actual game or story, but on what the writer might consider to be the “good way”.

    That good old fragile “suspension of disbelief” gets shattered by choice systems very very easily.

    • bikesarethefuture
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why games like dwarf fortress, project zomboid, are more about taking proper decisions

    • Julian@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the best I’ve seen it done is in Prey 2017. Lots of really good mechanics driven choices that are actually choices.