• penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve read somewhere that iMessage wasn’t considered “big enough” to be considerate a monopoly. Which is bullshit if you ask me.

    • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      8 months ago

      Kinda true in Europe though. Don’t know anyone who uses iMessage, it’s pretty much irrelevant. I know the situation in the US is quite different, but ultimately they don’t regulate for the US market.

    • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      Its only big in the US, most of the planet only sees iMessage as that borderline useless app Apple bundles in their phones.

    • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t think it’s ever happened to me that anyone told me that it was inconvenient for them that I didn’t have iMessage, compared to pretty much weekly exclamations of “But why can’t you just use WhatsApp like everyone else!?”

    • Hirom@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Apple would still feel pressure to add interoperability if all other big players do. iMessage would have a competitive disadvantage if it’s the only one where users are unable to message the rest of the world.

        • Hirom@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Yes. Still, it would be harder to not give a f if others walled gardens open up, and iMessage get disadvantaged by that wall.

          It’s as if iPhones were only able to make calls to other iPhones. Whereas all other devices where able to make calls to any device from any other vendor.