• Wirrvogel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    174
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    The NBC article is not telling you this:

    Klarna brags to businesses that offering their app will increase the average store order by 45%. That means that the average shopper is spending 45% more—for things they can’t afford—all because they don’t have to pay for it all at once. That’s messed up!

    Source: https://www.ramseysolutions.com/debt/klarna

    It is NOT about people who can’t afford food, it is about psychologically manipulating you into overspending and it works on so many people that the handful who it doesen’t work on are just the tiny exception.

    And that in a world that can only survive if we consume less.

    • oxjox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Thank for sharing this. You are so correct. There’s also social pressure to belong to these subscription services and paying added fees to “fit in”. I mean, if you’re struggling financially AND you’re paying for a Prime membership, you should reconsider your spending habits.

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      While it’s probably true that people spend more than they otherwise would (otherwise this wouldn’t be such a huge thing), that doesn’t follow from Klarna’s marketing figure of 45% higher spend per order. It is totally possible that people order more at once but less often. Especially for groceries, buying in bulk is often much better value, but it can be impossible if you just don’t have the cash around.

  • varoth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It’s almost like we have no money and don’t have a choice because having ridiculous luxury items like FOOD, requires you know, money.

    • bean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Cost of rent is such a con. It continues to rise and been proven to be manipulated by software (RealPage). Then shrinkflation… and inflation… cost of energy. Cost of insurance. Literally everything. EXCEPT the one thing which SHOULD go up: wages.

      But hey, corporations can just bake bread and be exempt from minimum wage increases; California and Panera, though they got in so much hot water it was backtracked… but holy fuck that’s the shitty weasel way of corps.

  • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    “people are too poor to afford to eat, come observe as we try and reframe this as a quirky habit of a younger generation instead of hilighting the fracturing of society as a whole!”

    she suffers with a smile

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes, I definitely volunteered to get an interest free loan on my groceries. It absolutely had nothing to do with my inability to pay in full immediately

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        From a purely mathematical perspective, if you are a perfectly rational consumer you would put everything on an interest-free buy-now-pay-later plan and then squirrel the money into a high-yield savings account, then pocket the interest.

        • scoobford@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s actually what I do lol. Unfortunately, I live paycheck to paycheck, so it only makes me around $10/month, but hey, it’s something.

    • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      But listen to our fun jingle!

      Isn’t is nifty to get into debt before your brain has fully developed!

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is yet another massive sign of an oncoming recession in the next 6-12 months. Inverted yield curve, more part time jobs, layoffs, commercial real estate collapse, etc.

  • solakin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    A lot of the knee-jerk reactions reek of avocado toast and bootstraps against The Youths™ and the article starts off a bit as living beyond your means, I shook my cane and felt it too reading the headline at first.

    But honestly, think about how these financing options are smoothing out paychecks for young people and low income folks, giving them more of a buffer in actual cash to deal with day to day stuff that might not be covered by these services. And anything that can put the screws to credit card late fees and interest and the fucking scumball payday loan industry is absolute tits IMO.

    I remember being poor and hungry early in life… absolutely would have taken advantage of predictable lower payments on as much as possible just to have more cash around because I knew just how likely it was to try cranking my junker of a car one morning and realize I’m walking to work for the next few paychecks.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      predictable lower payments on as much as possible just to have more cash around

      It doesn’t give you “more cash”. You are borrowing money and interest is definitely baked into it. Credit cards already let you borrow money for a month for free. Plus they have cash back / points and great fraud protection. Plus they help you build your credit score.

      You can get a basic credit card for $0 per year with a low limit, even if you have no credit. Don’t ever use “pay later” shit. Why do you think they invented it? It’s better for them, not you.

      • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean the one time I used one of these “pay in four payments” kind of things there was no interest added on. It just let me split up the cost easier rather than having to do it all at once and subsist on very little till I get money next.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I bought a fridge with a 3 month scheme when I was broke enough that a new fridge would’ve been the end of that month’s money. Zero interest.

          Don’t think I’ll ever finance a pizza over 4 payments like some other comment said though. Unless it’s my last pizza before I decide to stop existing or something.

    • Godric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Poor man buys boots biyearly, rich man buys boots once. Guess who pays more?

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I dunno, the way the world is hurling to a climate catastrophe. Money isn’t going matter. This is just smart financial planning.

  • anti-idpol action
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    2008 will be just a little slump compared to the upcoming crash. hope this time we’ll end up with a “burn down the wall street” movement, not “occupy wall street”

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      Burn down the gdp and everyone’s current retirement money? Great idea.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Wall street forced this entanglement to make themselves look valuable. We need to disentangle from their bullshit.

      • anti-idpol action
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        GDP is fake and moneyless tribal societies were able to invent mechanisms of caring for the elderly sometimes more considerate than what industrialized societies have

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Every system must be tried and taken to the extreme where it eventually crashes and gets replaced. It’s the nature of things.

    • Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean, the average human is better off than they’ve ever been largely due to profit driven innovation. So in that sense yes it has been. But yeah obviously capitalism will continue to slowly eat us alive unless we take control of it and better direct it’s benefits at everyone instead of just a few.

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 months ago

    I really thought these companies would get slaughtered by interest rates, fraud, and young people just never making the payments.

  • YaksDC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I don’t know the difference between this and using a credit card? You can extend payment using a CC, are the interest rates that much lower?

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      BNPL generally has a fixed payment schedule, while CC does not. It’s entirely feasible to use a CC and never pay interest by paying debts immediately (because you have cash liquidity). At that point, a CC becomes more of a low-friction “accounts payable” system for consumers than a financing scheme.

      BNPL’s primary value is in making large purchases because of low cash liquidity. When consumers don’t have enough cash liquidity for FOOD, that’s a sign of bad times.

      Or it means people are leveraging low interest loans to gamble their lunch money. Still not a good look.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not much difference, but it’s usually fairly predatory.

      It’s not that it’s a fairly new thing- it’s that people are having to do it for necessities. Which just makes everything more expensive as your (probably) now on a credit treadmill.

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 months ago

    I saw a youtube video yesterday about a bank executive explaining banks in a humorous way, and the best line was

    “you don’t need to afford the item, you need to afford the interest payments OF the item”

    • hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      He’s not wrong, but this comes off as “it’s only a banana Michael”. If he’s talking about a house, then yes. If he’s talking about groceries, that adds up quickly. Don’t just pay interests on everything.

  • charles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    What’s the interest payment/cost for this kinda service? I’ve fortunately never been in a position to need it.

      • charles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ahh, okay. So a financial gun pointed to your head. This has certainly no chance of going awry.

        • S_204@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          When I used to work at a Best Buy subsidiary, it was free for the 3 or 12 months… but if not fully paid by the end of term, you got walloped with the full interest on the whole value. It was like 28.9% APR too.

          People would routinely finance thousands of dollars in Christmas presents and would actually get furious, screaming at me or others if they weren’t approved for the amount they applied for. One woman was screaming that it was my fault and I just couldn’t help myself and replied along the lines of ‘nah bitch, you’re just broke. We’re hiring for the holidays though’ cue an epic Karen episode… later my manager told me that’s not how I’m supposed to get a referral bonus LoL. He was a good guy.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Most of them no interest 4x payments every other week…

      Some offer longer terms with interest though

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Little or nothing if you make the payments.

      If you miss a payment, the rates go sky high.

    • Cheems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve used affirm a few times in the past for larger purchases. So I bought a $600~ table saw and you pick the length of the loan in months 3/6/12 whatever. I didn’t get whatever months interest free but the interest didn’t seem too crazy. It was like a couple of bucks every month and if you pay it off early you don’t have to pay the rest of the interest. It’s convenient for the purposes that I use it for. I’m really glad that I’ve not been in a position to need it for groceries.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Payment Plans” can be set up on credit card charges with TD Canada for 6, 12, 18 months… where you have to pay 4%, 6%, 8% of the charge as interest, which works out to 8%, 6%, and 5.33% per annum respectively.

  • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Welcome to the company store where you can buy today’s necessities with debt against future wages.