The Associated Press, Reuters, and Agence France-Presse all released kill notifications to media outlets over the photo — released by Kensington Palace on Sunday — announcing that they would no longer be distributing the image.

The AP wrote, “it appears that the source has manipulated the image.” AFP cited an “editorial issue,” while Reuters said the photo was withdrawn after a “post-publication review.”

Following its release, social media was abuzz with sleuths questioning whether the photo was photoshopped or AI-generated. Many were focused on the cuff of Princess Charlotte’s pink cardigan, which appears to disappear in the photo.

Other users pointed out that Middleton was not wearing her wedding ring.

“no rings, kids all have their fingers crossed, weird blurring on charlotte’s cuffs, leaves on the trees despite it being early mach - i’m sorry but they’re just asking for us to go full katespiracy at this point,” one user on X wrote.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Okay, I thought the conspiracy theories were kinda silly at first. But now, even though I don’t care about Kate Middleton or any of the royal family, I gotta admit I’m kinda curious now.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      There is nothing to the conspiracy theories, she’s had abdominal surgery and wants to keep her health problems private. The UK press are intrusive and horrible, and the social media conspiracy theories are just gossiping.

      There are plenty of operations that would need a couple weeks of hospital recovery and about 6 weeks recovery at hone (Easter is only the end of March). People speculating are ignorant about basic medical matters and can’t let someone have their privacy. There is no conspiracy.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s so bad it’s like they’re trying to inflate the attention on the royal family. I can’t think of what they would gain from this type of attention, though… Other than to keep them relevant in the minds of the public and media, in the cheapest way possible?

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      From reading the article, she hasn’t been seen since Christmas and there were theories that she was in a coma or something.

      Then a photo of her gets finally released, and it appears to be digitally pieced together.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m going to be the pedantic person I guess.

          The voice isn’t really the same as the force, making people do something. It’s a kind of emotional manipulation. The Bene Gesserit are highly in tune with emotions, and they have learned to examine people and say things in a way that they can’t refuse. Jessica (and Paul to an extent) in the movie just have magic powers it seems, but the others it’s more clear what’s going on. Like when Paul is doing his speech to turn the Fremen into his followers, he’s reading them emotionally and manipulating them. (Paul is also a Mentat in the books, so he’s really good with logic too and that plays a role as well.)

          Sorry to be the book person. I hope this was interesting enough to justify ruining the joke.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Little over-energetic kids do weird finger stuff sometimes when trying to hold still. But the older two also, it does look like something kids might do to protest a sham picture that lies about their mum. The lack of a wedding ring also feels significant.

      • Kraiden@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m an adult and I still do weird stuff with my fingers. I absolutely cross my fingers like that.

        conspiracy theorists gonna conspiracy I guess

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          My middle finger has never bended in that way, and I thing with the tendons being the way they are, curling your pointer in while crossing your ring would be… impressive…

          I suspect that they used AI to edit out something like a toy or whatever, and failed to notice.

          In any case, fidgety kids is why you take dozens of shots, whoever released that photo wasn’t paying attention

          • ChexMax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            8 months ago

            I can do it with both hands. It feels awkward but not really uncomfortable. for whatever that’s worth

          • Nelots@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            and I thing with the tendons being the way they are, curling your pointer in while crossing your ring would be… impressive…

            I find it incredibly easy to do. It’s mildly uncomfortable to get my middle finger in that position, but once it’s there, curling my index finger is no harder than usual.

            E: picture of my hand doing the thing

                • Nelots@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Can confirm I can’t see the images on lemm.ee. And your links require people to sign up for your instance to actually view them.

                  Hopefully this link works. It does for me at least.

                  E: oh, for future reference, I was able to get a working link by going to your instance and clicking Copy Mbin URL instead of original URL

      • KISSmyOS@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, but the ring finger is all wrong. Its base doesn’t line up with the rest of it.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It is more subtle, but it looks like both of the other two children are crossing fingers as well. The boy in the middle seems to possibly be crossing his middle and ring fingers on his left hand and the girl is definitely crossing the same two fingers on her right hand. And Kate’s blurry hand on the kid’s waist makes little sense when nothing around it is motion blurred, unless, I guess, maybe she was yanking it away at the moment the photo was taken? But it seems like if that was the case the wrinkle/ fold in his shirt right in front of her hand would be moving too and not be as crisp as it is.

      • Zozano@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The common denominator is the ring finger, and she’s not wearing her ring.

        If I may put on mg tinfoil hat for a moment, those kids are obviously trying to tell everyone the person in the photo is not their mother, and is in fact a cloud person from Alpha Centauri.

      • GreatDong3000@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The only true giveaway is the girl’s left sleeve (our right) which has some erased parts (where it meets the hand). Everything else might be weird but no way to confirm, however that sleeve is 100% edited no doubt.

    • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not sure where you found this photo, I clicked a bunch of the links looking for the full photo and gave up. I did notice that only the kid closest to the window actually has a reflection though.

    • SheeEttin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It looks weird, but not impossible. I can get pretty close to that with my own hand.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is Business Insider’s front page right now including this story on the right (which it is also complaining about on the left). It’s really weird. Who exactly are they trying to appeal to, bankers who read the National Inquirer?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        But a really weird one, right?

        Like you wouldn’t expect a tabloid to have a bunch of financial news and you wouldn’t expect a financial news source to have a bunch of tabloid stuff.

        They’re a big company. They must have market research people. So what is the demographic they’ve found that makes this make sense?

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          BI has been doing tabloid-level journalism for a long time now, this doesn’t seem out of character for them at all. I’m sure their market research is entirely focused on maximizing engagement workout any concern about their reputation.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          SO weird. You make a very good point… is there some tabloid reader/business person overlap somewhere? Like, a huge one that’s invisible to normal people?

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            My guess would be to launder otherwise unpalatable, right wing, conspiracy bullshit. Pretty clever. Financial news is usually pretty straightforward and somewhat predictable. If it’s on here, then maybe it’s not so outrageous, right?

    • sirspate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Perhaps the customers are CEOs of AI companies who might want to sell the royals better deepfake technology?

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    If you look at the picture the photo shopping is fairly obvious, ignoring all the other nonsense being thrown in.

    The guardian has a zoomed up view of the area and it’s pretty crude photoshopping. It’s more than blurring.

    I get why news agencies are withdrawing it when they have policies against manipulation beyond anything simple like removing dust specks.

  • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Maybe it’s real, maybe it’s not, photography/photoshop etc aren’t my thing but maybe she really did have surgery not that long ago and wants to be left alone while she recovers? I feel like if she was dead we would know because that would be its own huge thing, so, just let the poor woman deal with whatever it is she’s going through.

  • systemglitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I looked at this and at first it looked fine, then I started seeing one uncanny after another. Wtf

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    What’s wrong with them shopping an image?

    Like what if the image they wanted to share was an oil painting? Would that be wrong? Even if being a painting meant that it may not in fact be an accurate portrayal?

    • Lazylazycat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      It has been photoshopped more than these agencies allow, and the reason people are interested is because there is a lot of speculation right now about where Kate Middleton actually is.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think more specifically they’re OK with edited images, but it must be declared that the image was edited. The assumption without that declaration is that the image is not edited, aside from composition changes perhaps (cropping, lighting, noise reduction etc).

        • Lazylazycat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          8 months ago

          It was announced in Jan that she had surgery and was in hospital for a couple of weeks, and all of her public engagements were cancelled after that. She’s likely just recovering but the Royal’s silence on it is generating a lot of conspiracy theory fuel.

  • Kraiden@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I don’t understand what would be photoshopped in that part of the image though. it’s too far down to be Kate’s hand, and if the kid was photoshopped in, why is her dress underneath showing through? The shop could only be concealing something ON the kid, right?

    My guess is she was holding a doll or something and that’s what was manipulated out

    I’m also not actually following any of this this though. Anybody got a TL;DR in what the conspiracy theorists are claiming?

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      She, the Princess of Wales, went missing following a surgery at the beginning of the year. The most prevalent claim is that there was a complication with the surgery and may be in a coma or worse.

      The idea is that telltale signs of the photo being altered would imply the family is hiding her condition and released a fake photo to buy time

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        The thing I don’t get is why hide it at all. “She’s recovering. That’s all you get to know.” Is going to attract the same attention as trying to hide it, while telling sane people to fuck off.

        Unless they offed her. But uh, we won’t go there.

        • GladiusB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well this would be another outspoken woman that was not traditionally married that died in suspicious circumstances within two generations. To say it wouldn’t look suspicious would be a lie.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            I would expect that, if they really wanted to assassinate her… they’d have found something less interesting. Like maybe something that gives her cancer or something.

    • Vanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t see anything in these photos that warrants an article. Seems like another lame click-bait conspiracy, probably cooked up by tabloids or the equally brain-damaged: “But where’s Kate?!1” Even The Verge has an article, JFC.

      Social media will continue to fuel endless garbage from the minds of who-the-fuck-knows and literally insane people. Can’t wait for AI to turborcharge humanity’s decent into madness.

  • Flex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    It looks like they used AI to generate a photo and then clumsily tried to clean up the artifacts in photoshop.