• jimbolauski@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    You tried to pass off studies of legal immigrats as illegal immigrants, got caught and now demand that I prove that they are different because you know you can’t find any studies to support that claim.

    No, they’re adding prisoners to the rate only for one group. They’re fucking up the numbers.

    They are moving misidentified prisoners from one group to another. Illegals in prison for a crime in 2012 that were not identified as illegals but were later identified move from the legal group to the illegal group. Are you claiming legals were misidentified as illegals?

    • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You tried to pass off studies of legal immigrats as illegal immigrants, got caught and now demand that I prove that they are different because you know you can’t find any studies to support that claim.

      Go learn what a null hypothesis is and come back to me.

      Are you claiming legals were misidentified as illegals?

      No. I’m saying they’re only giving the immigrants the “counting prisoners” treatment. They’re not treating immigrants and citizens equally in their “analysis”.

      • jimbolauski@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Go learn what a null hypothesis is and come back to me.

        How do you think the null hypothesis applies?

        No. I’m saying they’re only giving the immigrants the “counting prisoners” treatment. They’re not treating immigrants and citizens equally in their “analysis”.

        You’ll have to explain what you mean by the “counting prisoners” treatment. How do you think they are not treating immigrants and citizens equally in their analysis?