• Impound4017@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well said! My go-to example is ‘If someone calls and I’m not here, tell them they can leave a message’ because it covers both they and them in a singular usage.

    Sidenote: I also hate the way that some people act like languages are static things, despite the known history of languages to shift and change over time. English is arguably a German creole; we don’t get to act all sanctimonious now.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If we actually followed the “your gender identity is mildly inconvenient to me so should be banned” crowd and made everything unambiguously gendered, language would become far more awkward.

      “If someone calls and I’m not there, tell him or her that he or she can leave a message”.

      We could start doing this right now – every time they he or she uses the word “they”, insist they he or she repeats themselves himself or herself in a way that leaves no gender ambiguity…

      • dgmib@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        That could get really awkward if some of the neopronouns become common.

        “… tell him or her or zim or xyr or thon that he or she or ze or xe or thon can leave a message… “