• Android 15 is expected to introduce a Powered Off Finder API.
  • This API will enable compatible devices to be tracked even when switched off.
  • The feature is expected to be available on the Google Pixel 9 series, and the Pixel 8 series.
  • PineRune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    On one hand, this is great for lost or stolen phones. On the other hand (and rest of the body), this is horrible for privacy.

    • Hugucinogens@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The Dangerous Criminal (Poor) has always been used to justify asking people to give up their freedoms, in exchange for “safety”.

      And most of the time, the danger is close to made up. “Reality inspired”, if we were to be poetic about it. (Can’t say about this case, maybe your city is full of pickpockets unlike mine. But this API sure seems neither opt-in, nor like it’s going to be “limited to a select few models” going forward, to me…)

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s a trade in risk. There’s the really severe risk of being hacked, which has an incredibly low likelihood, vs the relatively low severity risk of compromised privacy but with an absolute certainty for likelihood.

        Personally, I prefer to take my chances with the high severity/low likelihood. But then, I’m also disgruntled that people don’t realise they’re basically being robbed of $100 every year, if not more, in terms of the value of their data.

        • theparadox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          This year is the year of fighting that for me.

          Like 15 years ago, I was willing to install a monitoring app on my phone and get like $40 in Amazon gift cards a year. Now that’s gone…Amazon is basically mask off Evilcorp, I have to opt out of letting AI read all of my text messages for “training data”, basically every service I depend on is throwing privacy policy changes at me every month and adding forced arbitration clauses to contracts, and my TV sends Samsung something 30,000 times a day while forcing my default channel to be streaming their ads network after every update. I’m so damn tires of it all getting worse. I feel like the last few years it’s really ramped up and the recent “AI training data” needs of virtually even major tech company have just broken me.

          Now I’m working to host everything locally and strip tracking and harden security as much as I can.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Forced arbitration needs to be made illegal, or at the very least properly regulated such that the arbitrator doesn’t work for the business.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I live in London. This feature is a must. The amount of theft in recent years is just bonkers.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Does it need to be non-disableable even with the passcode to remain useful?

          People really need to learn to think of the details and not the general idea.

          • Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            In my opinion, anti-theft features should be always active and your phone should be permanently bound to your account. There should be no way to unlink your phone from within the phone itself. If you want to sell it, you can unlink it from your PC, but there should be no tools for thieves to unblock and unlink the phone.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              Again, you are making decisions for people that others could EASILY abuse just because, what? You’re too stupid to turn the tracking feature on yourself? Stop requiring everything to conform to your stupidity.

        • PineRune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          I didn’t think about that. It completely defeats the purpose of geolocation for theft prevention and recovery, and at very little cost and effort to the thief. The amount of effort and technological advancement for something so simple to make it obsolete is almost comical.

      • Makhno@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        The fact that it’s a feature at all implies that other, possibly nefarious actors, have the ability to track it too

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is a great feature ngl. It may not be any use for majority users here but it’s a must have in my country for women. We already have government apps that track location if opted in but they only work as long as the phone isn’t switched off. Idk if it also requires a different hardware but if it was software only then it would be easy to install in existing phones.