Lets assume we develop the capacity to create virtual worlds that are near indistinguishable from the real world. We hook you up into a machine and you now find yourself in what effectively is a paraller reality where you get to be the king of your own universe (if you so desire). Nothing is off limits - everything you’ve ever dreamt of is possible. You can be the only person there, you can populate it with unconscious AI that appears consciouss or you can have other people visit your world and you can visit theirs aswell as spend time in “public worlds” with millions of other real people.

Would you try it and do you think you’d prefer it over real world? Do you see it as a negative from individual perspective if significant part of the population basically spend their entire lives there?

  • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Consciousness means that you’re capable of having a subjective experience. It feels like something to be you.

    If you only seem consciouss then you can’t experience anything. You could aswell not exist at all.

    • pileghoff
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you test that? How do you know that people around you actually have conscious and not just seem to have? If you can’t experience anything, how do you fake conscious? And is this fake conscious really any less real than ours? I think anything that resembles conscious well enough to fool people could be argued to be real, even if it’s different to ours.

      • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think it matters in this case. I decided that they are not consciouss and only seem to be because I didn’t want this thread to turn into debate about wether it’s immoral to abuse AI systems or not.

        • pileghoff
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it matters a great deal! I would like to believe that not only would I not use such a system, I would actively fight to have it made illegal.

            • pileghoff
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No. I’m very certain that my Roomba is not conscious. But If we can’t tell whether or not these people are conscious or not, then I don’t think it’s right to have this power over them. A better parallel than a Roomba would be an animal.

              • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyzOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                No. I wrote the premise myself and I specifically said they appear consciouss, not that they are consciouss. I get what you’re saying but that does not apply here. In this specific case we know for a fact that they’re not consciouss. The only other consciouss being there on top of you are the other real people in the simulation. Not the AI characters.

                • pileghoff
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m saying that appears conscious and is conscious could very well be the same thing, we don’t know, so in this imaginary world, I would not trust anyone who told me “don’t worry, you can torture them, they are not actually conscious”.

                  • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyzOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    If we have technology that enables such virtual reality there’s a good chance we have an answer to the hard problem of consciousness aswell. Again, that’s why I said that they appear consciouss. They’re programmed in such way but we know it’s just an illusion.

                    I totally see where you’re coming from though and I agree with you. There’s also that even if we knew for absolute certain that they’re not consciouss it would still take a literal psychopath to treat them the way they do on West World for example and even if you’re not morally doing anything wrong I’d still think twice wether I want to hang with someone that’s capable of acting that way. However if you are that kind of person then I’d rather have you take out your anger and fulfill your sadistic needs on a unconsciouss AI than real people.

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess it depends on how realistic the fake consciousness is. Is it indistinguishable from real consciousness? Or would I be acutely aware that every relationship I create is fake? I mean, I guess if we’re claiming it absolutely is not real, then I’ll always know that and it kinda taints the whole idea. It kind of makes me wonder about the whole concept. Like, if we did find a way to determine consciousness somehow, could that knowledge interfere with building an emotional relationship with a indistinguishable but fake conscious AI?

      • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not fake consciousness per se but a character that acts as it was consciouss despite the fact that it’s not. So called “philosophical zombie”

        You could have real relationships with other real people in the simulation. AI could be your barista, driver, random people in the city etc.