• Pendulum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oof, and the organiser of this stunt isn’t just doubling down, or tripling down, he’s quadrupling down on it.

    What an idiotic hill to die on

    • malloc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Negative attention is PR, never the less. It will drag on in courts. Probably pay a small fine but the $$$ from publicity stunt to outweigh court fine

      • VonReposti@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        According to Danish law they are risking 6 months of jail time (or 6 years under “particularly aggravating circumstances” but I don’t think that’s relevant), so not just money. The destroyed trophy, even though they weren’t directly aiming for it, a good lawyer might go after them on grounds of vandalism which is up to 1 year and 6 months under normal circumstances (disclaimer: I havent’t seen the video).

        So far I don’t think there’s much precedence on it so it is hard to predict the outcome. Usually you wouldn’t get the highest punishment for a first offence, so if it is jail time I’d be surprised if it’s more than a month. But a jail punishment will haunt your criminal record for 5 years while a fine will stay with you for 2 years, which is actually the the worst part if you have anything but a low-level job in Denmark.

      • LethargyTheGhost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        This hasn’t always been the case, valve has taken action before to ruin gambling sites and the attention could negatively affect them

    • simple@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      The guy that tackled him into the trophy will remember that for the rest of his life. Ouch.

    • Lanusensei87@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      8 months ago

      CS is awash with gambling websites that let you bet on the outcome of a match and potentially win some weapon skins. As for the reasons for the stunt, it’s explained in the article.

  • malloc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    The response time to that “rush” was god awful. This is what happens when you pick the bottom of the barrel security agency to do event sec work

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      8 months ago

      The problem with event sec (and I ran large events for a decade) is that organisers often dont treat you like you’re anything but a bunch of fuckwits and dont tell you anything about planned stunts or anything beyond “Dont let anyone past this point without a pass” asking questions and wanting to be in the loop often gets you told to “do your job” which is why I was very anal retentive about what was and wasnt our responsibility in our contracts and what we were/werent liable for. Often the “talent” or people attending will decide they want to do something off script and you have to take a moment to decide wether or not to crash tackle someone somewhere they shouldnt be who might also be a keynote speaker or the headlining artists manager… its almost always a shitshow of not enough info. I have a lovely story about a bass player for a band not wearing a lanyard and starting a fight with two of the security when they wouldnt let him back stage… theres an NDA involved though because he broke one staff members cheekbone before getting knocked the fuck out.

      The absolutely idiotic part was taking him to the ground, that outnumbered and not being aggressive it was unnecessary. Once it goes to the ground it almost always turns into a shitshow.