mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoPlayboy image from 1972 gets ban from IEEE computer journalsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square158fedilinkarrow-up1308arrow-down18
arrow-up1300arrow-down1external-linkPlayboy image from 1972 gets ban from IEEE computer journalsarstechnica.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square158fedilink
minus-squarefuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39arrow-down2·8 months agoThere’s also value in not basing your image compression algorithm on a low resolution scan of a magazine from the 1970s.
minus-squareBoscoBear@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·8 months agoSeems like this is a much more important than any of the other discussions going on. How many results were tainted by the fact that they were compressing a dithered print image.
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·8 months agoYeah, there is, so do not do that and let others do that if they want. Everybody can use whichever pictures they like as far as I am concerned. FFS, it’s as if there could be only one way for everyone
There’s also value in not basing your image compression algorithm on a low resolution scan of a magazine from the 1970s.
Seems like this is a much more important than any of the other discussions going on. How many results were tainted by the fact that they were compressing a dithered print image.
Yeah, there is, so do not do that and let others do that if they want.
Everybody can use whichever pictures they like as far as I am concerned.
FFS, it’s as if there could be only one way for everyone