lemmyreader@lemmy.ml to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoBackdoorslemmy.mlimagemessage-square113linkfedilinkarrow-up11.62Karrow-down138file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.58Karrow-down1imageBackdoorslemmy.mllemmyreader@lemmy.ml to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square113linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareRecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up76arrow-down3·1 year agoStill far better than a proprietary kernel made by a tech corp, carried hardly changed from release to release, even fewer people maintain, and if they do they might well be adding a backdoor themselves for their government agency friends.
minus-squareVilian@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down1·1 year agotrue, opensource can be flawed, but it’s certain less flawed than a closed source alternatives
Still far better than a proprietary kernel made by a tech corp, carried hardly changed from release to release, even fewer people maintain, and if they do they might well be adding a backdoor themselves for their government agency friends.
true, opensource can be flawed, but it’s certain less flawed than a closed source alternatives
Exactly.