The “Harry Potter” author slammed a newly enacted hate-crime law in Scotland in a series of posts on X  in which she referred to transgender women as men.

J.K. Rowling shared a social media thread on Monday, the day a new Scottish hate-crime law took effect, that misgendered several transgender women and appeared to imply trans women have a penchant for sexual predation. On Tuesday, Scottish police announced they would not be investigating the “Harry Potter” author’s remarks as a crime, as some of Rowling’s critics had called for.

“We have received complaints in relation to the social media post,” a spokesperson for Police Scotland said in a statement. “The comments are not assessed to be criminal and no further action will be taken.”

Scotland’s new Hate Crime and Public Order Act criminalizes “stirring up hatred” against people based on their race, religion, disability, sexuality or gender identity.

    • fiend_unpleasant ☑️ @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Oh I agree it’s a shit law, but if you are going to have shit laws make sure they apply evenly. I also have a personal vendetta against JKR. HP was just crappy Stsr Wars fanfic, and she is a trashcan of a human being.

    • redempt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thatcher hated trans people and Rowling is a Holocaust denier. what do we gain by allowing her to continue spewing hateful rhetoric to a massive audience?

      • ZeroTHM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        We have far too much to lose by allowing the government to dictate what people can and can not say.

        • redempt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          so you’d rather lose the trans people to violence or suicide than regulate hate speech against them?

          • ZeroTHM@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”

            I don’t wish anyone harm, but I will always choose the right to speak freely over what a governing body considers “safe”.