YAMAPIKARIYA@lemmyfi.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 7 months agoHoooooooooooooooooootfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square128fedilinkarrow-up11.1Karrow-down111
arrow-up11.09Karrow-down1imageHoooooooooooooooooootfiles.catbox.moeYAMAPIKARIYA@lemmyfi.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square128fedilink
minus-squarefidodo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoIs it that they’re inefficient or harder to maintain?
minus-squareFiniteBanjo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·7 months agoYes. Heliostat’s max efficiency estimates are like 70%, sun tracking panels 40%, static panels 20%.
minus-squaretheonyltruemupf@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months ago20% for static panels is fine though because they are spamable. They are cheap and you can just put them on roofs and parking lots.
minus-squareFiniteBanjo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·7 months agoNobody was arguing anything otherwise, I was just answering questions about why we swap back to steam power for largescale. If you’re powering some LEDs and a Toaster then yeah it’s fine, if you’re powering 10,000 then heliostat time.
Is it that they’re inefficient or harder to maintain?
Yes. Heliostat’s max efficiency estimates are like 70%, sun tracking panels 40%, static panels 20%.
20% for static panels is fine though because they are spamable. They are cheap and you can just put them on roofs and parking lots.
Nobody was arguing anything otherwise, I was just answering questions about why we swap back to steam power for largescale. If you’re powering some LEDs and a Toaster then yeah it’s fine, if you’re powering 10,000 then heliostat time.