• Crowfiend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Using median makes it a loaded statistic skewed in favor of the minority (in this case, the wealthy).

    Over half the country is living paycheck-to-paycheck, so that median number is already in the ‘well-off’ category by default, making them irrelevant to the main point of discussion.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You have it backwards. The mean, not the median, is skewed by outliers.

      If there are ten people in a room with $10 and one person with $1,000,000, the median is $10 whereas the mean is ~$90,000.

      • TrumpetX
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        No idea why you’re down voted for math :/

    • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Is that true? Median is literally taking the value in the middle. So if there are 30 million 70 year olds then it would be picking the 15th millionth person and using their savings.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You might not know what median means (math pun!).

      Averages or Means are skewed by outliers, not the median. The median is just picking the middle number in a list of numbers. There is no skewing possible. If you have 99 people making $1 per year and one person making $1B per year, the median is $1. The average/mean is $1,000,000.99 which is way skewed.