Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world to The Onion@midwest.socialEnglish · 6 months agoBring out the rule booklemmy.worldimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1800arrow-down120cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1780arrow-down1imageBring out the rule booklemmy.worldUltragigagigantic@lemmy.world to The Onion@midwest.socialEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square77fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down10·6 months ago Rules HAVE to exist. Enforcers HAVE to exist. Yes, that’s the fundamental contradiction of anarchism. Rules need rulers.
minus-squaremelpomenesclevage@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·6 months agoDo they? Why?
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down6·6 months agoAnarchism IS NOT about “no rule makers”. It is wholly about JUSTIFIED AUTHORITY, not NO authority.
minus-squareMeatballs@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-26 months agoCan you cite a source that says this that isn’t Wikipedia please? Or are you just making it up to fit your own personal beliefs about the subject Or are you just going to continue to call people stupid without backing anything up, huh?
minus-squareMeatballs@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 months agoSo you’re not willing to cite a source? Typical for your types
minus-squareMeatballs@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·6 months agodeleted by creator
Yes, that’s the fundamental contradiction of anarchism. Rules need rulers.
Do they? Why?
Anarchism IS NOT about “no rule makers”. It is wholly about JUSTIFIED AUTHORITY, not NO authority.
Can you cite a source that says this that isn’t Wikipedia please? Or are you just making it up to fit your own personal beliefs about the subject
Or are you just going to continue to call people stupid without backing anything up, huh?
So you’re not willing to cite a source? Typical for your types
deleted by creator