• astraeus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I need to read more of the court case, did he just create a ton of free accounts? If that’s the case, then he shouldn’t be charged with anything because the worst crime he has committed is breaching TOS. Don’t they have arbitration clauses in those?

    After reading a bit more it appears he social engineered away some of the limits AWS and Microsoft impose on new customers and just never paid his bills, regardless of how high the bills are. This still seems like a civil case, not a criminal case. If he stole money from a bank, criminal case. But he stole usage from two corporate entities by never paying for the usage. Imagine getting dragged into a criminal case for not paying your telephone bill.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      He’s not being charged with the not paying his bills part, he’s being charged with the committing fraud to be able to get that much server time part.

      • astraeus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah but isn’t that on the provider to verify?

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Indeed to catch a fraudster and then file a criminal complaint you should verify stuff.

          Attempt is usually punishable when it comes to fraud, btw, he’d be on the hook even if caught before services were rendered.