Tried logging into Experian and NONE of my information is working. Wonderful!

  • Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    7 months ago

    The fact that your SSN is so important and still so insecure is pathetic. Thanks US government.

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah I don’t get why that is? My SSN is NE079792B, what on earth can anyone do with that info? Pay into my pension?

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      “We identify you by a unique ID”

      Wow, a unique ID! Is it secret?

      “It’s totally top secret. It’s nine digits”

      Nine digits

      “Nine digits. With dashes in the middle.”

      And so that’s how the social security office …

      “Well not just social security. You see, to date it’s the only government institution that’s managed to deploy a database table so …”

      So what?

      “So we use it for everything”

      How is is top secret?

      “Well, it’s your job to keep it secret”

      That shouldn’t be too hard I guess. But what happens if it’s compromised?

      “We call this Identity Theft. It’s bad. Don’t let anyone else get your nine digit number”

      Uh … my cell phone provider wants my unique ID. Is this a scam?

      “No. Legit people are allowed to ask for your ID”

      Legit people

      “Any institutions we consider too legit to quit, ie too big to fail, are allowed to ask for it”

      Okay

      “And anyone else who’s legitimate can ask for it”

      Legitimate

      “Yes legitimate parties can ask for your top secret ID”

    • Urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      7 months ago

      The irony of a billion dollar company losing my personal info and helpfully offering me credit monitoring service from the other billion dollar company that lost my info. It’s so good.

      Throw into the mix: I had to do business with AT&T because they were the only ISP available to my Appartment complex. I never had the choice to not do business with these companies.

      Equifax handles my company’s payroll.

      Please, I want to get off Mr bones wild ride.

      • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        We finally got a viable replacement for Comcast internet. I changed the moment I was able to and couldn’t be happier. 1.2Gbps symmetrical connection for $85 a month. That plus YouTube TV is $70 cheaper than what I was paying Comcast for their garbage service that had constant outages. Before, the only options were mobile internet or Verizon DSL.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s really lame that companies like AT&T even need your SSN. Why do they need that to set up a phone line or an internet connection? There’s gotta be a better way.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        You can identify by other means. Or at least give the opportunity to use other means. If you can’t keep my personal information safe, you shouldn’t be allowed to collect it.

      • Breve@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Then why can I buy a prepaid SIM with cash and no ID? I do this when travelling to the US because it’s cheaper than international roaming.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        If only there were some sort of moniker you went by other than a SSN. That coupled with some sort of location data could narrow you down to, ooh, one person I suppose.

        In the UK we have NI number, which is used by my employer, pension provider, the tax services, the benefits office, and that’s pretty much it. It’s not used as a general source of ID by corporations.

        From an outside point of view, the US system looks crazy. And that’s coming from somebody who’s country has a TV license.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Then why do our ISPs in Germany at best just need our contract confirmation and maybe a SEPA entry?

        Even my bank I opened an account with just wanted to get my tax-id and my ID-number (wich changes with every re-issue).

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Something of a joke that, since the SSN is an identifier, the identity tool quickly becomes an identity theft tool once it’s been pilfered.

        With humans increasingly pushed out of the customer service loop, these security scams get easier every day.

    • GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      So they can permanently mark you as a poor when you miss a single monthly payment thus effecting your ability to do anything with money in the future making you poorer and perpetuating a cycle in order to trap you into a system that benefits from your suffering.

      • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 months ago

        Or even better, my experience with them - they can permanently mark you as poor when the person who stole your identity in the last data beach (Thanks Experian!) doesn’t make their monthly payment, thus tanking your credit while you’re entering escrow on your first home.

        Thanks AT&T, now my stolen information I never even gave you is probably back on the black market! The cycle continues.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        We’ve surrounded the prisoner in piezoelectrics. The more he struggles, the more electricity he produces!

    • fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      Because people finance their phones with AT&T, usually without realizing it. “Free” phones and discounted phones are not usually free or discounted. You’re forced to stay with them to get the discount off each month. I hate it because I’d rather just pay for my phone outright and be done, but then you actually pay more.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not sure I see how you end up paying more by buying your phone outright, it’s more up front but then your monthly price for service is lower.

        • fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          They give you a discount per month. So for example, a $1000 phone is on sale for $600, but they don’t give you $400 off up front. Its a $11.11 per month discount for the next 36 months. You pay $16.67 per month until its paid off. If you pay it up front you pay $1000. If you leave early or pay it off early you lose the $11/month discount on the payment for the phone

          Its intended to lure people in for an advertised cheap or free phone, but then you’re stuck with them paying for the device.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Depending on the calculation the phone + plan can be cheaper than just the phone and just the plan

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Not surprising. I wouldn’t be surprised if at some point every person in the US will have been affected by data breaches.

    • BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      That is very likely already the case, let’s be serious here. Our companies, especially the ones with really firm mono- or duopolies, give absolutely no fucks about protecting citizen data, they just have insurance to cover the damages.

        • BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          You’re right about cyber insurance, I wasn’t thinking about that, and should have put insurance in quotes.

          What I was referring to is when they just set aside some money for the inevitable lawsuit or fine, and do nothing about it.

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is a bit off topic and obviously bullshit, but I do recommend the social monitoring service, as well as freezing your credit. No real reason not to. I see freezing your credit as like setting a simple 2fa for your credit. You can unfreeze it at any time for free, and that extra bit of inconvenience of having to unfreeze it can stop impulse credit card sign ups. Also I have a “world class” Mastercard, but they also have free credit monitoring that I recommend. I think Visa might have something similar, but I’m not entirely sure.

      • cum@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah even if it’s not needed I personally don’t see any reason why you wouldn’t want to keep your credit frozen. I see it as like 2fa for your credit score.

    • rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Also same. I haven’t had anything to do with them since 2013 but they still somehow sent me an email. Not sure it is worth following up in, tho.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why would AT&T need to be storing social security numbers? For debts people owe them or something?

    • drislands@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Real answer: when people finance their phones, the provider needs to check their credit to confirm if they’re actually eligible.

        • drislands@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Probably so they can re-check you in the future when you inevitably renew your contract.

          Not that I agree with that. It should only be stored as long as it takes to run the check.