• FilterItOut@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Hopefully it brings consequences. Every time a bullet is fired, it is required (and I guess that must be in quotes for police officers…) that you be responsible for that bullet’s consequences. If you shoot at a legitimate threat, but hit the bystander, you should get charged. Cop, not-cop, firefighter, good samaritan with a gun, whatever. Charge them.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      yes, should.

      This, however, is America.

      Land of the free policeman. Home of the not brave policeman.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Hopefully it brings consequences.

      I’m sure it will. The cops will be put on paid leave and then given medals. Something like that. That’s what usually happens when cops kill innocent people.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      In many jurisdictions if anyone is hurt related to a crime, the criminal is legally responsible for all damages.

      So for a situation like this, the criminal would be responsible for all damages stemming from their initial crime when they chose to run. Any damage in the chase or subsequent actions until they are killed or in custody.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes, and that should be the case. However, cops (and everyone for that matter) should be responsible for every shot they fire. They should make sure their background is clear. If some freak accident happens, like a ricochet that shouldn’t be expected, then it should be fine, but they should have to make an attempt to be safe with firearms. You know a civilian would have to.

        • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          IDK if it should be the case, because that shit is getting abused to jail people who shouldn’t be jailed.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I haven’t really heard of that being abused. They have easier ways to do that. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s abused, but if you start a car chase you should be responsible for what happens with it, for example. I guess I can see the potential for abuse, but also I think it’s necessary to have.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      It is more likely that she be arrested for obstruction because she intercepted the bullet.

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        civilian-level firearms training

        You’re implying the cops are getting better training. Hint: they don’t

        • Case@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Lived next door to a cop, and down the street from another while growing up.

          My dad, who only went with his father, trained more often and more rigorously then they did. How do I know? Cops talk a lotta shit, and their kids are sick of fascism already. This was only up until like 6th grade even.

          Cop down the street was known for beating his wife, and was probably dirty as hell with the drive by attempt. Thankfully none of the kids were hurt. No one else was either, but even then I wouldn’t have shed a tear for a pig.