return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoBiden signs bill criticized as “major expansion of warrantless surveillance”arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square87linkfedilinkarrow-up1486arrow-down121cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1465arrow-down1external-linkBiden signs bill criticized as “major expansion of warrantless surveillance”arstechnica.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square87linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agoHe would have opposed the Civil Rights Act “because of the property rights element.” See? Principled stand. https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/91287-paul-says-he-would-have-opposed-1964-civil-rights-act/
minus-squarePsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI’m talking pure theory/ethics now. What I’d support politically will vary. I agree with free association and, to some degree, property rights. I don’t think my “yeah, fuck racists” stance is principled.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoOkay, but we aren’t talking about you.
He would have opposed the Civil Rights Act “because of the property rights element.” See? Principled stand.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/91287-paul-says-he-would-have-opposed-1964-civil-rights-act/
I’m talking pure theory/ethics now. What I’d support politically will vary.
I agree with free association and, to some degree, property rights. I don’t think my “yeah, fuck racists” stance is principled.
Okay, but we aren’t talking about you.