• vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    51
    ·
    8 months ago

    That would mean they would have to do actual development instead of just scraping off stickers, so I’m not holding my breath.

      • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Forgejo is a reactionary fork of Gitea, started because the creator of Gitea founded a company to maintain it.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          49
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Secretly behind the backs of the official community council and not many months later started to turn Gitea into an open-core product.

          And they also demand a CLA from contributors now, which is directly against the idea of FOSS.

          I was a bit sceptical about the justification of this fork in the beginning as well, but time has proven the Forgejo team to be sadly completely right.

          • antihumanitarian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            CLAs can be abusive, but not necessarily. Apache Foundation contributors need to sign CLAs, which essentially codify in contract form the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. It’s a precaution, in case some jurisdiction doesn’t uphold the passive licensing scheme used otherwise. There’s also a relicensing clause, but that’s restricted to keeping in spirit, they can’t close the source.

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        8 months ago

        They can decide and announce all they want. In the end they have to become a more compelling product than gitea on the merits, not just because of nebulous anti-commercial ideology.