neidu2@feddit.nl to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-27 months agoWith two Boeing whistleblowers dead in one month, either Boeing is actively killing them, or there are enough whistleblowers that this rate of death is not statistically significantmessage-squaremessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1720arrow-down128file-text
arrow-up1692arrow-down1message-squareWith two Boeing whistleblowers dead in one month, either Boeing is actively killing them, or there are enough whistleblowers that this rate of death is not statistically significantneidu2@feddit.nl to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-27 months agomessage-square86fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down1·edit-27 months agoThe guy already gave his statement at a deposition. Why on earth would they kill him after the fact?
minus-squareNOT_RICK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30arrow-down4·7 months agoPerhaps as a warning to other potential whistleblowers?
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down2·7 months agoMaybe the compound infection took longer to take effect than they had planned.
minus-squarethemurphy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down4·7 months agoTo stop others having the same idea.
minus-squareAmidFuror@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down2·7 months agoTo give conspiracy theorists something to do.
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·7 months agoIt’s a message about the consequences of such a move
The guy already gave his statement at a deposition. Why on earth would they kill him after the fact?
Perhaps as a warning to other potential whistleblowers?
Maybe the compound infection took longer to take effect than they had planned.
To stop others having the same idea.
To give conspiracy theorists something to do.
It’s a message about the consequences of such a move