• TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I feel like an important thing he forgot to mention though is that it lets you allow multiple users to have root privileges without having to share passwords or SSH keys

    • Tobias Hunger
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why would they need to share ssh keys? Ssh will happily accept dozens of allowed keys.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Indeed useful to not having to share passwords. I think sudo historically started as a way to let some users in a company for example manage printer server settings without having a root password. (And I believe it was Ubuntu in 2004 which promoted sudo and forced the default user after an installation to use sudo to perform root commands).

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Somebody call the Wahhhmbulance. This guy is outmoded. How about expanded security permissions for small groups of people in a larger directory? How about PAM auth plugins? How about escalation preventiontion for those same people, PLUS auditing instead of just seeing “root did something dumb”.

    I don’t even get why this gent even bothered to wine and complain about this except that he doesn’t “get it”. This has been a solved issue for over 20 years now, and you don’t see large swathes of folks bitching and moaning about sudo at all.

    • 7heo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you need to provide tools that cross security boundaries then […] a small web app is better [than sudo].

      A web app? Effin really!!? 🤨

      • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is the part that confused me most. At the first mention of web apps, I just thought, okay, if you have a web server you can have it run under a service account that can do what it needs to do. Sure. Kind of beside the point, but sure.

        Then this came at the end and and I did a double-take. He’s really suggesting a web app as a substitute for sudo in general? Two questions:

        1. Wat?
        2. Wut?
  • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Sudo and doas are 1000x (in loc) more complex than they need to be for destop pc. Yet they are always default installed and some tools even expect them.

    edit: didn’t know that doas is that small. I thought it has ~1/10 of sudo’s code but it’s actually ~2k vs. 132k of sudo.

      • NekkoDroid
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        doas is relativly simple (a few hundred LOC), especially compared to sudo. The main benefit of run0 over doas is that it isn’t a SUID binary, they are similary complex.

        • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nzM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          doas is relativly simple (a few hundred LOC)

          Actually it’s close to 2k lines of code (1,946 to be exact). But yes, it’s certainly a lot simpler than sudo (132k).

      • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I use rdo and ssu, each with a bit over 100 loc C code. Though they both have their own strong and weak points, i’m sure there are other similiar tools around.